|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,403
Posts574,934
Members14,706
| |
Most Online32,084
Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,715 Likes: 2467
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,715 Likes: 2467 |
As a general rule, if you increase the weight of your shotgun 10 percent, you will get a 10 percent reduction in felt recoil.
However, if you reduce the weight and velocity of your shot payload by 10 percent, you will have a 20 percent reduction in felt recoil.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
2 members like this:
DAM16SXS, Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93 |
Stanton,
That is correct, relevant and timely as we approach dove season.
As we discussed previously, there are other advantages to moderate velocity of shot shells. Very few if any downsides.
Did we set a a record for having two gun and ammunition related post in a row on this site? š
|
|
4 members like this:
graybeardtmm3, CJF, Stanton Hillis, Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,929 Likes: 1313
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,929 Likes: 1313 |
I may be presumptive here (having only used it briefly) but I did not find my 5lb1 2-inch gun to be a bad recoiler at all.
Insignificant would be the word I would use to describe it, and at 15/16th of an ounce of shot (instead of the 7/8th of an ounce it was proved for) I would have expected a more noticeable effect...
Maybe I am just an insensitive old white guy after all?
Last edited by Lloyd3; 08/19/26 11:16 AM.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488 Likes: 1880
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488 Likes: 1880 |
I do switch over to 1 1/4 oz of 5s and 6s for later season pheasants hunting with a 12 gauge. Especially if it is cold.
Best,
Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 998 Likes: 140
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 998 Likes: 140 |
I may be presumptive here (having only used it briefly) but I did not find my 5lb1 2-inch gun to be a bad recoiler at all.
Insignificant would be the word I would use to describe it, and at 15/16th of an ounce of shot (instead of the 7/8th of an ounce it was proved for) I would have expected a more noticeable effect...
Maybe I am just an insensitive old white guy after all? Guns that fit well have less perceived recoil...guns that don't beat us up.
|
|
2 members like this:
DAM16SXS, dogon |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93 |
Ted,
1 1/4 oz of shot is needed at times in my opinion. 1400 FPS is never needed and often detrimental to both effectiveness and shooter comfort.
|
|
2 members like this:
Ted Schefelbein, Stanton Hillis |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,715 Likes: 2467
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,715 Likes: 2467 |
I wouldn't be surprised if it were ever determined that America's fascination with ultra-high velocity shot shells began when it was decided that it was needed to make steel lethal.
The thinking could have been, if 1400 fps is better for steel, it should make lead more of a long distance killer, too. Lots of fallacies in that line of thought, however.
I well remember when that occurred.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
2 members like this:
DAM16SXS, Richard Hale |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488 Likes: 1880
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488 Likes: 1880 |
Ted,
1 1/4 oz of shot is needed at times in my opinion. 1400 FPS is never needed and often detrimental to both effectiveness and shooter comfort. To the best of my knowledge, Iāve never chambered a round that went above about 1200fps. There are some old 3ā magnum 12 and 20 gauge rounds about the place, probably have been here for 30 years, and they still float around 1150fps, they just feature a heavier load. They still didnāt get used up. Best, Ted
|
|
1 member likes this:
Richard Hale |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2026
Posts: 109 Likes: 93 |
Some of the European 1 1/4 pigeon loads are 1400+ and iirc federal loaded some listed higher than that. Donāt think it lasted long. Never fired one.
|
|
|
|
|
