|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
3 members (Lloyd3, 2 invisible),
777
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,505
Posts562,175
Members14,588
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 117
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 117 |
I have located what appears to be a nice Purdey 12 bore non-ejector gun. The gun is from 1892. This gun would be a nice a Purdey without having to pay more for an ejector gun. Logic being ejectors are not required out in the field. However, someone stated what is the reason for having a London Best when the gund does not represent a London Best (ejectors, self-opener, etc).
Thoughts?
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,313 Likes: 617
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,313 Likes: 617 |
Depends on what you are looking for....for me, if it fit and was sound, ejectors are a non-issue. You've been looking a while, does it make the heart pitter patter? Only you know...
Steve
Firearms imports, consignments ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/Ez9oz9Rl.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1 |
I like high grade guns that have been used a lot. I like getting all that craftsmanship and engraving and hand work for a lot less money that the same gun would cost in high condition. My friend Joe likes high condition lower grade guns because he gets a gun that is just like new for a lot less than if the same gun was a high grade gun. It is just what makes you happy.
Certainly I would expect an identical Purdey with ejectors to cost more than the one your are looking at.
Best,
Mike
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
There is a line in the sand, in which a Purdey, isn't quite a Purdey - but still can be a handsome enough gun.
Perhaps this one is, a less than best.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 278
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 278 |
It would not bother me one bit as long as I'm not paying "A" quality price for a "E" quality gun. Is the grade marked on the breech face or barrel flats? -JB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Confirm that you are talking about a Purdey best sidelock. They were selling some graded SL's and boxlocks at that time. Ejectors were rapidly becoming a common feature then, but not entirely established at that point in time and not definitive of a best gun. Also, confirm that the gun is a game weight gun (I believe that is what you want) and not a pigeon/fowler.
Remember that the brand name is not definitive of the original quality of the gun. Brand and quality are separate items.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,733 Likes: 211
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,733 Likes: 211 |
I'll bet that there are quite a few best Purdeys out there that were ordered as extractor guns.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Not so, the English game shooter likes his ejectors.
They are the heart and soul of the driven game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,784 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,784 Likes: 15 |
I have a WW Greener highest grade (not my opinion, Greener's email) from 1880s, and a Greener Royal from the 1890s - and they were both made without ejectors.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 135
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 135 |
It all depends on what you really want in a gun. I believe it will still be a "best" if it was what Purdey put out as a "best" when it was made. If the engraving and condition and barrels are up to your standards, and if the price is right, then go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
