Originally Posted By: L. Brown
...it seems somewhat contradictory of you to beat the drum for universal health care, while at the same time opposing the plans being put forward by the current candidates. What you're saying there, obviously, is that there are right ways and wrong ways to do universal health care. Therefore, the concept isn't as universally good as you're touting it to be...


First of all, I have never touted universal health care as "universally good." I have said that UHC plans in OECD states have lower per capita costs and better outcomes than America's private insurance industry-managed system. And I have backed that claim with facts.

My opposition to HillaryCare and ObamaCare is no contradiction whatsoever. Both proposals are based on private insurance industry management - which is keeping the fox in control of the hen house. As I pointed out before, even CAHI, a front for the private insurance industry, admits that government-run health plans cost less to administer.

Again, I have provided facts in detail, and cited my sources. Can any of the UHC naysayers do the same?

Sample my new book at http://www.theweemadroad.com