|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,637
Posts563,641
Members14,602
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574 Likes: 167
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574 Likes: 167 |
I haven't had any "performance" issues with the 2 or 3 I've owned, and I felt fit and finish were appropriate for a gun of that price range. However, I will say that just about every Matador on which I've tried the SST has had a pretty creepy trigger. That may be less important to scattergunners than riflemen, but that trigger is the one feature that causes me to avoid Matadors.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,804 Likes: 1425
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,804 Likes: 1425 |
Avoiding trouble with ANY double gun can often be as simple as avoiding ejectors and single triggers. Thanks for the commentary, gentleman.
Best,
Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,492 Likes: 291
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,492 Likes: 291 |
I agree with Ted on the two features that commonly cause trouble on cheap guns. My Dad's 1960 12 gauge Matador did have a creepy trigger and developed problems after I sold it. However, the buyer went "inside" and got him working after a couple of unsuccessful attempts. I will not have a SST Matador, my big ten being a reliable double trigger ejector gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
