S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (Nelsons Custom),
362
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,443
Posts544,800
Members14,405
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
Re: 1954 Simson Combination
Der Ami
04/18/24 02:27 PM
The porn hit me too, I tried to get to the photos quickly, but it still came up. Maybe the computer will stop it, but if it does, the photos will be blocked also. Mike
6
55
Read More
|
|
Re: A mystery pre-war 30-06 JP Sauer came home today
Der Ami
04/18/24 02:15 PM
Raimey, I see only one Imperial Eagle, it is the acceptance stamp applied by the arsenal ((unit armorers?) to the already scoped Sauer rifle, built around a pre-98 transitional action.
buckstix You have mentioned a desire to scope the 8mm and I cautioned against changing the rifle in a way that can't be undone. I have noticed that the front base is dovetailed, and the rear one is screwed down with 4 staked in screws. They can be carefully removed (with screw locations preserved, so that when replaced the stake marks and engraving will match) and a Cerrosafe model of the interior of the bases can be made as samples to duplicate in making new rings. This type ring will be considerably easier to make and fit than Shuler claw mounts would. An important consideration is to ensure the locking lever in the front base doesn't go all the way down and bottom out. If it bottoms out, you don't know if it is tight. Mike
14
470
Read More
|
|
Re: Advantages of a Lefever over a Smith?
Marks_21
04/18/24 02:11 PM
Yeah, kind of like one's taste in women, it is simply a matter of personal opinion... I'd step on an L.C. Smith's throat to get to a nice Lefever, but the Smith's do alright as well, sooner or later someone takes home the homley girls too!
27
890
Read More
|
|
Re: SxS muzzle loading shotgun
Longknife
04/18/24 01:38 PM
Manufacuring SXS shotguns is a highly specialized skill, requiring special tools, equipment and training. I doubt that there were any SXS s-guns made in the US before the late 1800's when the large companies began manufacturing them after the cartridge craze had caught on. Many gun smiths imported guns from England and had their name engraved on them, or engraved it their self. I'm betting you will find English proof marks on the bottom of the barrels. With the Cove name it should bring a slight premium to collectors of western memorabilia....LK
10
359
Read More
|
|
Re: Stock Duplication---Open-ended Question
Hoot4570
04/18/24 01:19 PM
Thanks guys. Of course, I didn't include the entire story---a failing of mine. I bought a complete barreled action for an 1895 Lee Navy. I have been looking for a stock without much luck and had decided to go try and make a pattern stock, getting it duplicated when I finally get there. Then, wonder of wonders, an aftermarket stock shows up over on GB. I was trying to gauge my bid against the cost of duplication.
I appreciate the input!
6
211
Read More
|
|
Re: 1954 Simson Combination
ellenbr
04/18/24 12:59 PM
I would say a modified Anson & Deeley Body Action. Just not enough pins.
Simson was nationalized by this point was a part of the conglomerate.
But why is there so much porn associated with the fotos? Maybe just Ford & I??? But we are both from Alabama & live on the edge???? But you should choose >>Family Safe Content<< and then choose the >>BBB<< code, copy & insert it.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
6
55
Read More
|
|
Re: A mystery pre-war 30-06 JP Sauer came home today
Parabola
04/18/24 12:33 PM
I believe the bases for the claw mounts Pre-date the 1914-15 military service. They are decoratively engraved and I don’t think a military arsenal would have allowed time for that to have been done.
The shortage addressed when the lines became static was for rifles already set up with scopes.
14
470
Read More
|
|
Re: What grade D. M. Lefever & Sons
Marks_21
04/18/24 12:26 PM
SO DO I!! I believe the above gun is a 7D. I say this because it has single dogs, no engraving behind the breach balls and less (maybe?) flourish on the narrow portion of the action. But as I post this photo of a 6C ---- I could be convinced it’s a C minus!
2
189
Read More
|
|
Re: WTB Purdey label
susjwp
04/18/24 11:48 AM
Check eBay. Peter Dyson in the UzK , Henry Krank, have retpros. There is a poster on eBay in the Ukraine that has both paper and leather trade labels.
2
85
Read More
|
|
Re: A mystery pre-war 30-06 JP Sauer came home today
ellenbr
04/18/24 11:25 AM
Ford:
The Nitro stamp looks to be coupled with the >>4000 atm Beschusspatrone<<. Those >>Caveman w/ a Staff<<(3 I see on the bottom of the barrel near the ring) are Sauer process marks. Then the odd Imperial Eagle, Sauer used a similar one, on the right side of the tube near the scope mount @ the rear of the barrel near the ring could be the Prussian Spandau arsenal in 1915 where these stop-gap rifles were topped with glass and pressed into Sniper service.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
14
470
Read More
|
|
Re: SxS muzzle loading shotgun
Stanton Hillis
04/18/24 10:46 AM
From what I see in the pics you provided it looks for all the world like a 16 ga. Powell double percussion I used to have, and used on doves and quail. But, I never found out anything about it, either.
10
359
Read More
|
|
Re: Advantages of a Lefever over a Smith?
keith
04/18/24 09:58 AM
I bought my first Lefever as an afterthought. I saw a guy in the parking lot of a gun show carrying three guns in cases, and asked if he had any doubles to sell. He had a two nice doubles, a 20 ga. L.C. Smith Ideal Grade with ejectors and an FE Grade Lefever. He knew very little about them. They had belonged to his late father-in-law, and his wife wanted him to get rid of them. At the time, I was partial to L.C. Smith shotguns, and owned several. I bought the 20 ga. Ideal Grade Smith and he gave me his business card. I kept thinking about the Lefever, and called to ask if he still had it. I met him at his business a couple days later and bought it. It was so light and trim that I honestly thought it was a 16 ga. I learned it was a 12 ga. when I dropped 16 ga. snap caps into it and they fell deep into the chambers. I didn't know it at the time, but I had lucked into one of the scarce 12 ga. Lefevers built on a smaller frame. With 28" Krupp Steel barrels, it weighed only 6 lbs. 3 oz. and had engraving and several other features more commonly found on E Grade guns. The vast majority of 12 ga. Lefevers fall in the 7 to 8 lb. range, and some are a bit heavier. I've been collecting and studying them ever since, and in all those years, I have only found one other 12 ga. on a small frame, and it weighs 6 lb. 5 oz. I really like my Lefevers. To me, they look better than any other American gun and have an almost semi-custom aura. But I am not so smitten as to be blind to some faults or weaknesses they have. Earlier in this Thread, the Preacher posted a couple pics of the stock heads of a Lefever and an L.C. Smith. He commented "The head of the Lefever stock has more wood surface to transmit recoil..." so finding the cracks shown in his photo is not common. That is absolutely incorrect. Cracks of that nature are quite commonly found on sideplate Syracuse Lefevers. Every surviving Lefever is over 100 years old. Many are found with a piece of wood missing above or below the sideplate, and many are found with a glue joint where an old repair was made. Not a deal breaker if caught and properly repaired before cracks get too bad. Even really good Stockmakers find both Lefever's and L.C. Smith's to be difficult (expensive) to restock. Here's one that recently sold on Gunbroker that has a new and poorly matched piece of wood spliced in below the left sideplate: Another fairly common Lefever malady is a weak or broken top lever spring. I've seen this often enough that I have the theory, with no proof, that Dan Lefever may have bought or made a large quantity of top lever springs that were tempered incorrectly, or made from a bad heat of steel. Again, not a difficult repair, and the spring is not complicated to make. Finding an original spring from parts dealers is always hard because of the demand for them. And that brings us to another minor problem.... The design of hammerless Lefever Guns was always evolving. They are pretty reliable, but like any used gun that is over 100 years old, other parts can wear out or break. No gun is perfect or indestructible. Many have been worked on by people who don't know what they are doing. As I pointed out in the "Lefever Gunsmith" Thread last week, this can make finding any needed replacement parts more difficult than many other guns that didn't have so many variations, and also had far greater production numbers than Lefever's: https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=645257&page=1
27
890
Read More
|
|
Re: Advantages of a Lefever over a Smith?
Stanton Hillis
04/18/24 03:15 AM
Personally, and this is INDEED a personal issue, I'd rather have a very nice example of an American vintage double than that of a foreign made one. I'm not taking anything away from fine English guns, it's just that I'm not an Anglophile and never will be. I bleed red, white and blue. Parker Ithaca Fox L C Smith Different strokes for different fokes ...... Would love to find a good Lefever 12 ga. with 32" barrels (or a 20 ga. one with 28s).
27
890
Read More
|
|
Re: Advantages of a Lefever over a Smith?
Ted Schefelbein
04/18/24 02:57 AM
Ted: It isn't just the Yank doubles that are getting old here, eh?
My "newest" British double is from 1905, my oldest perfectly-functional side-by-side (also British) is from 1866. A well-made gun is almost timeless if (a big if) it receives proper care and feeding over the years of its use (I almost typed "lifetime" here). We all get fooled from time-to-time but... if you've been paying attention over the years of your own life, you'll learn a few things about what to look for in an older gun. Contrary to some strongly-held opinions here, American doubleguns from the 1890s were actually very-well made. It wasn't until economic forces (from around the world, essentially) forced the American manufacturers (& that's all of them, not just Smith) to modify their production processes to reduce the cost of the human component. The big difference today between a "fine" gun and all the others (see the above photo of the trouble-fee gun) is that rather-essential "human element". That's were the artistic part of any gunmaker's creation comes from. As the old saw goes..."beauty comes from art, art come from grace and grace comes only from God." Lloyd, Your Richards is better built than any old American double. Far better. Best, Ted
27
890
Read More
|
|
Re: Stock Duplication---Open-ended Question
SKB
04/17/24 11:23 PM
Thank you for the recommendation, I am currently only running my pantograph for myself and clients that I am stocking guns for, I am not able to offer it as a service currently.
You might try Gene Simillion as well, he has an excellent reputation for close tolerance work.
Dustin is spot on, few people understand how physically demanding that job is.
6
211
Read More
|
|
ISO Aime Maisonnial label
Dave in Maine
04/17/24 11:00 PM
I'm looking for a label - original, reproduction, computer file of the image, I don't care - to go with my Aime Maisonnial. Intend to build a hard case for it and a label would be very nice to have.
0
37
Read More
|
|
Re: Stock Duplication---Open-ended Question
DSchrank
04/17/24 10:03 PM
Forgot to add, but two others that have been recommended by highly skilled gunmaker are Steve Bertram and Dan Rossitier. I have no personal experience with them, but great respect for the person who recommended them.
6
211
Read More
|
|
Re: Stock Duplication---Open-ended Question
DSchrank
04/17/24 09:57 PM
I’m not a stockmaker, but I have done a few of my own. I have worked on six duplicate stocks and a few “semi-inlets” such as Boyd’s. Two of the duplicates I was impressed with. One was from Jim Bisio and the other Chuck Grace. There are a few others I have used that I would not use again.
6
211
Read More
|
|
|
|