doublegunshop.com - home
Posted By: KY Jon Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 01:10 PM
https://auctions.thegunrunner.com/l...ga-side-by-side-shotgun-30-steel-barrels

Odd double on auction. Not a Crescent. Trying to figure out if it is a Union (Fire) Arms from Toledo or Belgian made gun. I recall Twin Port was one of the hardware store guns they, Union Arms made, but that could have been used by several makers. Barrels do not look like Union, look more like Belgian to me. Perhaps the barrels were imported and finished from there. I might just buy it to find out. Not worth too much and wont break the bank.

I regret not buying a Union Arms double years ago which was made with a Lefever Ball and socket joint. It was about this quality level. One of the Lefever sons went up to Toledo for a time after the last Lefever venture folded. Perhaps he brought a few rough actions with him to use up.
Posted By: Ted Schefelbein Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 01:29 PM
Being a firearms museum curator is overrated. Especially for your heirs, should they suddenly find themselves as firearms museum curators.

Just sayin’.

Maybe buy better guns for your museum, if you go that route.

Best,
Ted
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 02:06 PM
It's a Hopkins & Allen hammerless, with monobloc barrels

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

The tape marks are probably from an attempt to prevent "auto-opening" wink

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

JohnE would know more
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 02:07 PM
Another tradenamed by Shapleigh c. 1912

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]
Posted By: ClapperZapper Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 02:14 PM
Sleeved?

Lock plate shape doesn’t seem to match UFC, nor does the action shape.
I find the US made side locks of that time to always have additional material behind the breech.
Everyone, I see has the bolster behind the breech
[img]https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.maynardsfineart.com%2Fauction-lot%2Fthe-union-firearms-co.-side-by-side-12-ga.-ser_A865247942&psig=AOvVaw3nLjKThqxEE3OCCX8gLBW_&ust=1684591793809000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CA0QjRxqFwoTCLCf4dDHgf8CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAI[/img]
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 02:48 PM
My take is that that style gun started life as a Hopkins & Allen --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

When H & A folded it was picked up by Iver Johnson --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

and pretty quickly lost the sideplates and emerged as the Hercules --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

most know.
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 03:00 PM
Thanks Dave: Note the Iver Johnson variant did not have the forward pin

And while we're on the subject - the difference in the blueing between the breech (probably 1020) and the tubes (likely decarbonized steel) is apparent
Posted By: ClapperZapper Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 03:09 PM
Top lever and spindle evolution always fascinates me.
There must have been jobbers punching out top levers in the 3 common forms, and delivering them by the barrel.
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 05:12 PM
Quote
Note the Iver Johnson variant did not have the forward pin

The pin is there (the hammer has to rotate on something) but just covered by the sideplate on that I.J. serial number 181 --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 08:48 PM
Here's another
https://brandusedworks.hibid.com/lot/63519-107007-63606/twin-ports-fire-arms-co--s-s-20-ga-shotgun/

J.P. Lovell Arms sold a tradename Eureka Gun Co. hammerless

and a H&A hammer gun, also with monobloc barrels and the same font

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

The Duluth MN-Superior WI Metropolitan Area is commonly called the Twin Ports. I couldn't find a hardware store using that tradename though. Possibly Kelley-How-Thomson Hardware, Marshall-Wells Hardware (sold a Marshall Arms Co. Crescent) or Siegel Hardware in Duluth.

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 11:24 PM
Here is another --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Daryl Hallquist Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/19/23 11:52 PM
You guys are good. Thanks, Daryl
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/20/23 12:07 AM
Just remembered that this may have begun at W.H. Davenport --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I have not seen a complete W.H. Davenport gun but here are a pair of sideplates --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/20/23 05:43 PM
Rev-O-Noc for Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/20/23 10:41 PM
Just to keep things going, here is another marked Spring Field Arms Co. --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Drew Hause Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/21/23 12:30 AM
The well is deep...but I don't think I'd take a sip wink

That Spring Field Arms Co. is interesting. Springfield was of course a Stevens lower price line, and I've never seen the 2 words, and couldn't find for what co. the gun was tradenamed.

Nor could I find the company that tradenamed Seminole

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

An odd sideplate and different action sculpting H&A

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]
Posted By: Researcher Re: Not a Crescent? - 05/21/23 02:37 AM
Originally Posted by Drew Hause
The well is deep...but I don't think I'd take a sip wink

That Spring Field Arms Co. is interesting. Springfield was of course a Stevens lower price line, and I've never seen the 2 words, and couldn't find for what co. the gun was tradenamed.

An odd sideplate and different action sculpting H&A

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

J. Stevens Arms Co. changed from their lower priced line being Riverside Arms Co. to Springfield Arms Co. in the 1928/1929 time frame, long after these sideplate guns were being made.

Drew, the lower gun in your post is the No. 210 as shown in the 1914 Hopkins & Allen catalog.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

In addition to the No. 210, they offered a No. 220 with ejectors --

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

There was also a No. 230 ejector gun with engraving.
© The DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com