S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
0 members (),
303
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,522
Posts545,769
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106 |
Rocketman--Yes to both your questions. As you can see from Trev's photos, the engraving is definitely very different. The crossbolt shows quite clearly in the illustration of the "Anson" in the A&N catalog, so it must have been a standard feature on that model. Wonder if there are any other features that would distinguish it from the Proprietary? The Anson does have bushed strikers. Are those also found on the Proprietary?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
The Woodward shown above does have bushed strikers. Also, in the photo below, you can see the screw threads of the screw grip mechanism. Here is what seems to be another example of the A&N under discussion. http://gunroom.shootingsportsman.com/listing/1873
Last edited by Rocketman; 09/18/08 01:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 34 |
Well,
Heard back from the U of G today.
The gun was purchased by a Miss Jones, in 1930, for the sum of 25 Pounds Sterling.
I'll send for the page of the sales book, soon.
That certainly fixes the manufacturing date.
Cheers Trev
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1 |
Trevj, 25 pounds in 1930 had the same buying power as 1911.86 current dollars. This from Historical Currency Conversions JC
"...it is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance."ť Charles Darwin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 34 |
I'm quite looking forward to seeing if there is enough info there to figure out which family member that was, whether it was one of my Grandfather's sisters, his mother, or his wife.
Yep! 25 Pounds was not an insubstantial sum at the time.
Cheers Trev
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
My A & N sold for seven pounds, seven shillings! It looks similar without the engraving. I like it a lot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534 |
Hi Larry, My gun has bushed strikers as well, so we are converging on the "anson" model. It is not a screw grip, so won't qualify for the "proprietary" model. My W&S catalog does not show the breech face of the Proprietary, so I can't say if it was made with Bushed Strikers. WC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
wc - see the Woodward photo above for one Proprietary model breech face that is bushed. Does the catalogue picture of the Anson model show the semicircular action inlets/stock protrusions?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106 |
My Ansons aren't screw grips. The photo of the model I have in the catalog copy provided by A&N is a little hard to see, but it does seem to show the protrusions--which are definitely present on my guns.
Looking at the 2nd A&N catalog page I have, I see that ALL the boxlocks listed are referred to as "Ansons". The specific model I own, and the one Trev owns, is the only one shown with a Greener crossbolt.
Mine also sold for 25 pounds, in late 1933.
Last edited by L. Brown; 09/19/08 08:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
This is the stock inletting detail I'm talking about.
|
|
|
|
|