|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,445
Posts544,832
Members14,406
| |
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 516
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 516 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,284
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,284 |
Looks like a wristbreaker to me 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,524 Likes: 73
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,524 Likes: 73 |
Not an unknown to remove them if a problem arose with the timing ,so when the trigger is pulled the gun does not fire. Often a temporary removal ,with the intention of haveing put right at a more conveinent moment that never comes.It is not unusual to find both sides removed. In the case of some Webley guns ,athough the action was drilled and machined out for intercepters as they used a standared body machining ,they were not actualy fitted to the lower range guns.
B999 are we looking at the same picture? I can not make out the name.But Lancaster it ain't.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 516
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 516 |
No, its not a Lancaster. High quality Birmingham made gun.
Thanks for the explanation "gunman".
Dustin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,741 Likes: 743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,741 Likes: 743 |
If it had a scalloped back and decent steel barrels, in proof, I might try to buy it off you, Dustin. As you know, I have a weakness for a boxlock with all the bells and whistles...
Best,
Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,284
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,284 |
Yeah, I realise it isn't, it just looks so like mine engineering wise.
T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
