April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
7 members (j7l2, Karl Graebner, SKB, Hoot4570, Jason Dubois, Jimmy W), 447 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,466
Posts545,094
Members14,409
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 6
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 6
Powder and primers are important, but don't overlook the wad. My 12 ga. target loads (American Select, Win 209, Win AA) drop 700psi if I use a Rem TGT wad instead of a Win AA wad. With my 20 gauge target loads, switching from WinAA to RXP20 wads drops the pressure by 2100 psi.


Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
It would seem to me that anything at or below the 8,000 psi black powder levels would be fine. As long if the gun was in good shooting condition, and having the action bedded in case of wood shrinkage due to age. In guns that have not been bedded, dropping around 20% of psi, or to around 6400-6500psi seems prudent in order to take it easy on the old girl's wood. The exception would be a very light English gun, perhaps even lower...

Last edited by Ken61; 05/10/14 02:38 PM.

I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
"The Wood" would much prefer a 1oz load moving 1150 FPS @ 9K PSI than a 1Ľoz load moving 1250 FPS @ 7K PSI. PSI is not a factor in figuring recoil nor is it much of a factor in what the wood feels.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
I'm with Stallones, 18 gr Green Dot, 1 oz shot

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 4
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 4
I have found that about 7000psi is the proper low pressure.. Lower than gives irregular ignition and irregular results on birds and clays

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Ok, If it's not a matter of PSI, then what is the major factor involved in determining recoil and consequential effects on wood? Is it FPS? Is it a relationship between load weight and FPS? Is anyone able to explain the actual physics? That way we can avoid merely asserting opinions.


I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718
Likes: 479
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718
Likes: 479
Recoil is the factor. Heavy loads, at low velocities, still put a lot of stress on wood. It has been suggested that light loads, at low pressure and most often low velocities, generate low recoil and hence less stress on wood. It all comes back to simple vector physics, for every vector, action or force there is an equal and opposite vector, action or force. If you push a payload out the barrel a force is thrust into and against the stock.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Ok, but I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind what 2-Piper alluded to, that a 1oz/1150FPS/9000PSI load would be easier on the wood rather than the 1oz/1000FPS/6500PSI load that I have been using.


I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 25
Boxlock
Offline
Boxlock

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 25
Ken61, 2-piper was merely restating the free recoil formula, where mass and velocity are the only determinants of same. Since your load is equal in mass and lower in velocity, he would be most accepting of it, even if it had higher pressures...which it doesn't.

Last edited by Emmett Boylan; 05/11/14 01:00 AM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Ken;
I made absolutely no comparsion to the 1oz/1150FPS/9KPSI to a 1oz/1000FPS/6.5KPSI load. Quite obviously that load would be still easier on the wood than the load I stated.
I in fact stated that 1oz/1150FPS/9KPSI was easier on the wood than a 1Ľoz/1250FPS/7KPSI load which it is in spite of the later load having a lower PSI.
Indeed I stated to use the same factors used for calculating Recoil when considering the wood, PSI is not one of the factors of Recoil.
Indeed PSI is necessary to cause the movement of the load down the barrel, but the amount of weight moved & the speed at which it is moved are the factors of recoil. We too often get hung up on pressure as being "Only" the peak pressure. If you accelerate 1oz of shot out the muzzle to 1150FPS you have done a given amount of Work, irregardless of the peak pressure of the load. If you compared the Average pressure (Area under the pressure curve) over the entire length of the barrel of two loads moving the same amount of shot to the same speed you would find them for all practical purposes identical, even though they may have a widely varying Peak Pressure.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.080s Queries: 36 (0.054s) Memory: 0.8487 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-25 12:43:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS