S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,506
Posts545,601
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,534 Likes: 169
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,534 Likes: 169 |
Sure would be nice to see the proof marks Mike
USAF RET 1971-95
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
Humpty & PM,
yes H&H is a way to go, the problem is that the gun's bores have straight rifling from the forcing cone onwards up to three inch from the muzzle. In addition the bores are .730" only. One possible way to go would be to backbore to .735" (the H&H standard), leaving the last three inch of twisted rifling. Barrel wall minimun is now .040" and measures .055" min. in the "choke" area. .
As to the rifling, yes I may call it invisible, it has six grooves. The are no chokes at all, the only difference there is the twist and barrel wall thickness. Hope the British audience may have something to say on how they are currenlty using these ball and shot guns.
On another issue, yes it is surpring the unusual chamber length, it may have been enlarged.
EJSXS Your bore measurements sound mint DO NOT ALTER THEM IN ANY WAY The invisible rifled guns' bores are tighter than rifled choke guns. I suspect your chambers were enlarged at some point in time.
Last edited by PM; 06/05/14 08:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931 |
Humpty & PM,
yes H&H is a way to go, the problem is that the gun's bores have straight rifling from the forcing cone onwards up to three inch from the muzzle. This is not a problem. This is the description of "Jungle Gun". It was developed as a way to create a ball-and-shot gun while not infringing Fosberry's patent. The patent was for a gun which was rifled only in the choke, and since in Jungle Gun you have rifling which goes all the way in the barrel, there's no infringement of the patent. Of course, if the contemporary Paradox bullet is greater than the groove (rather than bore) dia. of your gun, it would be not safe to shoot. A ball-and-shot gun seems to be a good option for hunting big game in the brush, if most shots are under 50 yards, and the longest don't exceed 100.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
Pictures had been posted on first message. More to come soon.
EJSXS
Last edited by ejsxs; 06/06/14 09:25 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
Humpty & PM,
yes H&H is a way to go, the problem is that the gun's bores have straight rifling from the forcing cone onwards up to three inch from the muzzle. This is not a problem. This is the description of "Jungle Gun". It was developed as a way to create a ball-and-shot gun while not infringing Fosberry's patent. The patent was for a gun which was rifled only in the choke, and since in Jungle Gun you have rifling which goes all the way in the barrel, there's no infringement of the patent. Of course, if the contemporary Paradox bullet is greater than the groove (rather than bore) dia. of your gun, it would be not safe to shoot. A ball-and-shot gun seems to be a good option for hunting big game in the brush, if most shots are under 50 yards, and the longest don't exceed 100. Hey nice gun. There is considerable difference in the rifling between the two methods with the Fosbery design having much deeper rifling at the choke and other nuances as the bullet and or shot proceeded up the barrel. The later nitro paradoxes were capable of accuracy beyond 100yds with the Super Magnum Explora producing muzzle energy in the 375 HH range.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,737 Likes: 96 |
Holland & Holland Paradox ammo is very pricey. I tried Sellior & Bellot slug ammo loaded with a Brenneke slug in 65mm. cases in a friend's Paradox gun. They come in packs of five. And lo and behold they shot and regulated perfectly. Much, much cheaper. Not saying that they will be perfect in your gun but worth experimenting with. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
PM, Lagopus,
thanks, I certainly will not go beyond 100 meters with mine, nor the local conditions for boar and free range deer will allow in southern Chile. S& B are well represented here and will ask wether they have or import the Brenneke slug.
EJSXS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931 |
PM, a question for you. Do you think that back, say, in 1900 or 1910 all Paradox, Jungle Gun, Colindians were meant to shoot basically the same ammo - meanind, the same 1 3/4 oz conical made for 12 bore rifles, and differing only in powder loads? So that an owner could use factory ammo, and won't be limited to casting own bullets and rolling their own cartridges? And so the intended bullet's diameter for most guns of this kind should also be the same?
__
Btw. The records of the first public trials of Paradox quoted in Teasedale-Buckell's Experts on Guns and Shooting mention firing the gun with round ball, and reporting good accuracy. If I lay my hands on a Paradox some time, I guess a ball over 3 dram of BP would be the first load it will see.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
[quote=Humpty Dumpty]PM, a question for you. Do you think that back, say, in 1900 or 1910 all Paradox, Jungle Gun, Colindians were meant to shoot basically the same ammo - meanind, the same 1 3/4 oz conical made for 12 bore rifles, and differing only in powder loads? So that an owner could use factory ammo, and won't be limited to casting own bullets and rolling their own cartridges? And so the intended bullet's diameter for most guns of this kind should also be the same?
__
[/quote
Maybe. But because I know there were various loadings 28,30,33,36, 41 and 47 grains of cordite within just the rifled choke offerings all after 1900, I wouldn't presume all bullets for every system were .735. I would err on the side of caution, start with a .729 or .730 bullet and a light load. A good mold throwing a paradox conical and several sizers would be the ticket.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 622 |
Holland & Holland Paradox ammo is very pricey. I tried Sellior & Bellot slug ammo loaded with a Brenneke slug in 65mm. cases in a friend's Paradox gun. They come in packs of five. And lo and behold they shot and regulated perfectly. Much, much cheaper. Not saying that they will be perfect in your gun but worth experimenting with. Lagopus..... I am sorry, I would never fire modern slug ammo in a period ball and shot gun or a paradox. For the most part these are load your own type guns.
Last edited by PM; 06/07/14 01:37 AM. Reason: grammer
|
|
|
|
|