S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,520
Posts545,735
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 614
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 614 |
This week we are looking at two "classics"..or maybe only one classic, you be the judge. Please remember to keep it clean and pick your favorite of the two below. Think if you only had the choice of one double below to bring to an upland, waterfowl or clays "gunfight"! May the best gun win! Gunfight Friday Round #5 - Carbon (& Wood!) CopiesParker Reproductions vs Parker BrothersParker ReproductionsParker Repros were manufactured at the Olin-Kodensha plant in Tochigi, Japan until around 1989. Only offered in DHE, BHE and maybe a few rare higher grades, the Parker Repros were quite faithful and attractive copies of the original Parker guns. Parker BrothersThe original Parker guns were built in Meriden, Connecticut for over seventy years. Nicknamed "Old Reliable" and for good reason, many original Parker Bros guns are still being reliably used today.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 426 Likes: 11
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 426 Likes: 11 |
I work on both pretty much on a daily basis ,and a faithful rendition the repro is indeed...both beautiful guns ,but the new ones just don't "feel " the same I can't explain it .I would take an original any day. But ,the chance of taking a pristine DH Parker (reproduction )out for a bird and not worrying about ruining an heirloom is quite attractive .
Last edited by Newf; 03/13/15 09:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,141 Likes: 200
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,141 Likes: 200 |
A scratch or finish wear on a BHE Repro is much more an issue than that same scratch or finish wear on an original. I hunt and shoot my original Parkers on a daily basis, but I'm afraid to take my 28 gauge Repro out of the house for fear of making it somewhat less than "new".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,383 Likes: 106 |
I guess I wouldn't worry so much about a DHE Repro, but agree that I might be concerned about a BHE. I owned an A-1 Special 2 barrel set for a time. (Factory engraving, not the fancier custom stuff.) Very nice gun, but one reason I parted with it was that I didn't want to take it hunting. It also had a trigger deficiency: Only one.
One advantage the Repros have is better dimensions than most of the originals. No question you can find originals with decent dimensions, but it does require some looking to come up with both modern dimensions and the other characteristics you're looking for. I just wish they'd made more DT Reproductions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103 |
When I fell for sxs guns, Parker was the main reason. Call it 1st love or whatever, but make mine the original article!...Geo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 7 |
I'd choose a Parker Reproduction everytime. Better everything, including value -- except collectibility, but their time will come. I can afford and justify the cost of ownership of a 28-ga. Repro, I could never justify the cost of ownership of a similar conditioned 28-ga. 00-framed original.
Wild Skies Since 1951
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 36
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 36 |
Old reliable all the way. Don't like the fake engraving. Don't like the carnival glass looking case colors. Don't like shiny. Don't like high nose on the comb. Don't like made in Japan. Other than that Repos are OK. I guess.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 518 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 518 Likes: 4 |
Boy! This one presents a lot of ifs.
Bought with my own money, just to use? Repro every time. Crazy money and content to leave it in a closet? The original.
The Repros out there are mostly as-new guns. Do I assume the original Parker would be in similar condition? If so, go with the original.
By far, the Repros have more shootable dimensions, as was pointed out above.
Reliability? Not much to complain about with either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 7 |
Don't like the fake engraving. It's real. The D-Grade may not be 100% hand-engraved, but it's definitely real.
Wild Skies Since 1951
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,767 Likes: 757 |
Neither. I can't figure out how the Parker ever came to be named "Old Reliable" with all the stuff inside of them, and all the pinned stock heads I have seen over the years. The Parker Reproduction single trigger was described to me as "crunchy" by someone, years ago (wish I had thought of it) and, it fits, perfectly.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|