S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,505
Posts545,556
Members14,417
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Awhile back I bought a few firearms from an elderly couple and one of them is a single shot pistol. In researching I discovered the pistol is of French manufacture made by Gaubert circa 1870. Further research uncovered the fact that it's chambered for a 9mm Rimfire shot cartridge which is still loaded by Fiochi. Hmm! 9mm shot eh! A quick viewing of the barrel confirmed its lack of rifling** so it is in fact a sawed off shotgun. I am in the process of getting it registered as AOW per BATF requirements which ought to prove interesting considering the pistols age! Hopefully my "criminal" days will be over shortly! Jim **UPON FURTHER REVIEW THE BARREL IS RIFLED ALBIET LIGHTLY. THIS CAN BE SEEN WITH THE BORE SCOPE HELD AT JUST THE RIGHT ANGLE.
Last edited by James M; 12/07/16 02:38 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
Your point about this handguns age is interesting. When I spoke to an agent at a BATF Field Office concerning FFL transfers of pre-1899 Antiques, I was told that the ATF does not consider pre-1899 Antiques to be firearms in the legal sense, and that they should not even be entered in an FFL's bound ledger book. Edit: I'd be interested in seeing a picture of the barrel breech to see if it is perhaps a pinfire rather than a rimfire. Not a typical pinfire hammer, but it seems odd that the tit on the hammer would strike the circumference of the cartridge rim. Here's a 9 m/m pinfire cartridge:
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,759 Likes: 749
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,759 Likes: 749 |
I remember reading something like that on pre-1899 guns, Keith. They were not supposed to be in the bound book.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,729 Likes: 487
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,729 Likes: 487 |
Common sense would decide it is an antique with an obsolete cartridge which would seem to make it a non firearm. But common sense is all too often uncommon these days. If they do decide you don't have to register it make sure you get it in writing and keep it where you can produce it if the need ever comes up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Keith: At first I too thought it was a pin fire but note it has a firing pin which would be unnecessary if it were a pin fire. Additionally; I had a 32 rim fire blank and tested the gun with it. Yep it went bang just fine. I agree it's an antique but the BATF regulations are vague in regards to "antique" NFA weapons. My past understanding is that a pre 1899 sawed off shotgun in, for example 12 ga, would still be considered an NFA weapon regardless of its age. BTW: My research has discovered that the original intended use for this pistol was as a garden gun. In other words one to keep handy to eliminate any outdoor pests or vermin. Jim An additional point: These are apparently pricy over in Europe judging by this auction: https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-us/aucti...6f-a54d00db2e79
Last edited by James M; 12/07/16 01:28 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 337
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 337 |
You should have kept your mouth shut. The BATF doesn't care about such until you make them, then you get the full bureaucratic tarbaby. Live and learn. JR
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Your point is well taken John: However I, as well as everybody else, has to dispose of their firearms eventually and I don't want to put a burden on my family with perhaps an illegal one. I also suspect I may just get a pass here due to its age.
Last edited by James M; 12/07/16 01:31 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Update: I just did a more thorough inspection of the barrel on this pistol and there is rifling albeit very light. I think this takes me and the pistol off the hook. I have read that these were also made to fire 38 Rim fire ball ammunition as well so the rifling makes sense. I will just drop it at that. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,081 Likes: 473
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,081 Likes: 473 |
|
|
|
|
|