doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Custom Shotgun Order Form

Still unable to prove me wrong and still LYING I see.

Your premise that gun registration did nothing to stop the attack was incorrect.

The guns used in the NZ attack and 97% of all guns in NZ at the time were not registered.

The 3% number came from my second post in that thread correcting my mistake of simply saying "guns" instead of explicitly stating that a small percentage of firearms were indeed registered while the vast majority of firearms were not registered at that point in time. I added the link to the NY Post article supporting my statement.

One inaccurate post which was immediately corrected and supported with evidence does not make someone a liar.

What makes YOU a LIAR is the way you pick out a piece of the story and misrepresent it as the truth when in fact your version of the events is pure fiction designed to fit your narrative or in this case smear me. That is why we call you LYING keith. Because that is what you do.

All because you are wrong and I called you out on it. You were wrong in the initial thread and you are still wrong.

LIES, LIES, and MORE LIES from LYING keith. It is what we have come to expect from you Billie.

Actually you had stated first that the incident in New Zealand happened in spite of the registration of guns there. I told you guns were not registered in New Zealand. Turns out neither statement is 100% true but I was much closer than you since only 3% of the guns in New Zealand were registered at the time of the incident.

I provided a photo of a New Zealand Police Seargent holding up a Military Style Semi-Auto AR-15 like the one used by the Christchurch shooter. These firearms required a special permit in New Zealand, i.e., registration. The shooter bought all of his guns from a Gun Store, shortly before the shooting, so the permit had to be filed.

The government is using those registration records right now in an enforced confiscation of semi-automatics. But that special permit or registration did not prevent the shooting.

I used the same term you did you putz...simply "guns" I was FAR, FAR more correct than you were unless you meant "some guns"....is that what you meant or were you LYING like you always do?

And you are still using data from known anti-gunners to support your lie. You told that lie more than once, and I provided a QUOTE from you proving that. I even put your words in BOLD RED TYPE.



Now you are trying to tell us that your statement about no gun registration in NZ was a one-time mistake, and that I am seizing upon a simple human error.

No Stevie... I'm seizing on a simple human LIE... a LIE told by you... and repeated by YOU.

It becomes even more special as you now concoct more LIES in order to try to excuse your previous LIES

Keep flailing.

]

My guess also....a turkey for a turkey

As I have pointed out to you multiple times in the past, bullies do not make sympathetic victims. It pleases me greatly to see Frank get a bit of what he dishes out. I did think it was uncalled for to insult pecker gnats by comparing them to Frank.

I know you were missing my music posts. Nothing says Country Music like a bunch of smashed instruments. Hard not to like Sturgill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsrsrOB0zNQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsrsrOB0zNQ

You are seriously stupid Stevie. You could be the poster boy for illustrating what a Libtard is. I provided you with a picture of the type of Military Style Semi-Auto AR-15 used by the gunman, along with four other rifles including another semi-auto and a lever action.

Now here is a link from the NY Times where the 4th paragraph confirms that the gunman used a Military Style semi-auto... as if a picture wasn't enough...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/13/world/asia/new-zealand-guns.html

In case you don't know how to click on a link, here is that paragraph... copied and pasted to make it easy for you. But maybe you need someone to read it to you:

New Zealand�s prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, announced six days after the attacks that most semiautomatic weapons, including all of the military-style firearms used by the gunman, would be outlawed. Three weeks later, the country�s Parliament overwhelmingly passed a law banning them.

And let's not forget that you LIED when you tried to tell us that your statement claiming there was no gun registration was simply a one-time error. You repeated that statement several times in the original deleted thread, and have repeated it since then. I QUOTED you and provided the post number and date that you repeated it.

Now it seems that you are trying to say that I claimed that ALL GUNS were registered in New Zealand. You know that is simply another LIE Stevie. I clearly and repeatedly said that ALL HANDGUNS were registered, and that ALL Military Style Semi-Autos required a special permit, i.e., registration. Data from those permits is being used to enforce confiscation of those semi-auto guns right now.

Maybe I could put this into a coloring book for you Stevie. I don't know how to make things any more simple or clear. And none of this changes the fact that you continue to use highly questionable data from known anti-gunners. Do you really believe that handguns and MSSA rifles only constitute 3% of the total number of guns in New Zealand? Well, it does appear that you accept any bullshit that anti-gunners say. You keep repeating that crap.

Actually you had stated first that the incident in New Zealand happened in spite of the registration of guns there. I told you guns were not registered in New Zealand. Turns out neither statement is 100% true but I was much closer than you since only 3% of the guns in New Zealand were registered at the time of the incident.