|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (gunmaker, welder, SKB, 3 invisible),
488
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics37,982
Posts538,046
Members14,338
| |
Most Online695
Nov 17th, 2023
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 335 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 335 Likes: 15 |
It turns out that this gun has 2 5/8” chambers but is marked with 1 1/8 oz. proofs. Kirk Merrington thinks it Is original and non -altered.As 2 5/8” was the standard 12 gauge length in the US until 1929, does anyone know ifthe English makers bored them that way on guns ordered by Americans? Sandlapper
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,595 Likes: 68
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,595 Likes: 68 |
My 1928 Boss has 2 5/8" chambers.It was ordered and delivered to a guy in New York city. It is a game gun. Funny thing, previously my friend owned another Boss Pigeon gun owned by the same guy a few serial numbers before mine.
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I seriously doubt that the 2 5/8" chambers had anything to do with made for America. At least as early as W W Greeners ninth edition of the gun & its development (1910) he stated that the "nominal' 2½" chambered 12 gauge had chambers from 2 9/16" to 2 58" length. I do not know how much earlier this practice was used. I believe that only very early British 12 gage guns will be found with actual 2½" chambers. The European standard of 65 mm s 2.559" or only .0035" shorter than 2 9/16".
Also, 2 5/8 was an American standard, not "THE" American standard as late as 1929. Boh L C Smith & Lefever Arms Co had standardized on the 2 /4" shell in the 12 gauge long before this date, & perhaps others as well.
Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9 |
Go here: http://dspace.nplg.gov.ge/bitstream/1234/84152/1/James_Purdey_1930.pdfThat's a Purdey catalog from 1930. Go to 5th page -- POINTS TO CONSIDER WHEN ORDERING A GUN See 2nd paragraph, first sentence. I've seen 12g Purdeys with proofmarks for 2 5/8" chambers. OWD
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,521 Likes: 20
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,521 Likes: 20 |
OWD:
Link returns a This Page Cannot Be Found message.
Rem
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9 |
Sorry. Here's the page.  OWD
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 496 Likes: 29
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 496 Likes: 29 |
Greg,
Thanks for the link and it confirms Purdey extended the chamber length in 1930 for the American destined guns. I wonder if Hussey would have done this practice in the early 1900s.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9 |
Yeah - that's the question.
If they had, wouldn't they have proofed them at 2 5/8", too?
I'm not sure.
OWD
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 860 Likes: 202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 860 Likes: 202 |
OWD;
You, I am certain will recall that case length was not a mark of proof for the period of time when the Hussey was built.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,817 Likes: 9 |
Nope. Forgot that. You're right, though.
So was the "Diamond with 12-over C in it" used for both?
"Diamond with 12-over CL" was for 2 3/4" (and 3"?), right?
OWD
Last edited by obsessed-with-doubles; 05/01/20 10:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
