S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,443
Posts544,786
Members14,405
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384 |
Why? it's quite funny to read people's assumptions base on thinking someone is from california
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145 |
So, we know you are untruthful, to amuse yourself. Anything else you care to come out of the closet about?
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384 |
You are as dumb as Joe says your are. qed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,033 Likes: 45
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,033 Likes: 45 |
Nice fowler. Since it is sleeved and tubed by Briley, it should be fine with steel shot. Or even tungsten, for the long second shot. I would not assume that. Why not SJ?? I thought being sleeved with modern steel sleeves would make it steel shot compatible. Would you mind explaining your answer? Merely curious. Also, have never owned or even seen for that matter a sleeved gun. Thanks. It really depends on what kind of steel was used for the sleeving tubes. After that, it comes down to wall thickness. If the sleeved tubes were struck in a way to get the barrels weight or gun to balance at a certain point, wall thickness certainly will come into consideration. The next consideration would be how the new sleeved barrels are bored. Hopefully everything was cut/machined correctly. Bore diameter within specs, chamber and forcing cones etc. Barrel interiors cut with dimensions out of spec for the gauge can cause serious issues. If the steel used for the sleeved barrels is fairly modern and of good ordnance quality, everything was machined correctly, wall thickness are good (which 99% of the time on newly sleeved barrels the wall thickness’s are more then adequate), chokes are appropriate…..then there shouldn’t be any issues at all with using steel or modern non-tox. Lots of 'if' and 'should'. Why would a buyer assume any of that? Nobody knows without getting a sellers statement traceable to Briley, nor should they pretend to know. A Briley 'lead shot only' choke system is as likely as not.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145 |
qed?
quae in speculo resplendent vultus
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,144 Likes: 1145 |
Catch up, dude. The tortoise has passed you as you snooze.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
You are as dumb as Joe says your are. qed Never said or thought Stanly was dumb....thinks he knOws it all, braggadocios, self centered, lives in a fAntasy world.....ect....ect...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Why don't you junk the fOe ten junkers Stan and buy you a real man's classy shooter ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,701 Likes: 99
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,701 Likes: 99 |
Stan["quae in speculo resplendent vultus"]...mc["Quod erat demonstradum"]
I hate it when the smart guys around here start typing in french...Geo
|
1 member likes this:
Stanton Hillis |
|
|
|
|