March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
8 members (Dan R, canvasback, David Williamson, craigd, ChiefAmungum, bsteele), 321 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,373
Posts543,984
Members14,389
Most Online1,131
Jan 21st, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 75
Likes: 29
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 75
Likes: 29
I’m trying to understand the relationship between cast-off and cheekpieces, so I’m looking for input. I’m building a stock for a bolt action rifle that will primarily be used with open sights (peep on the rear, blade on the front), but it will sometimes be used with a scope. I’m building it in the style of this Minar rifle: http://www.finegunmaking.com/page32/page46/page46.html

I have a pretty good understanding of how comb height and eye alignment differ between open sights and scopes, so the stock will be shaped with a nod towards open sights. I’m inclined to include some amount of cast-off in the buttstock. I’ve read that cast-off works in tandem with a cheekpiece (the Minar rifle has a cheekpiece), but I also see a lot of shotguns with cast-off and no cheekpiece. So my question is this: for a rifle stock that will be used primarily with open sights, and occasionally a scope, would cast-off be wise, and if so, should the cast-off be accompanied by a cheekpiece? I welcome input and opinions on this. Thank you!

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,710
Likes: 730
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,710
Likes: 730
I don’t have a good answer for your question. Sorry. But, you might cross post your question on the rifle/custom gun categories here. There are seriously qualified rifle stock makers who poke in there, regularly, who seldom post here in the shotgun section.

Good luck, by the way.

Best,
Ted

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 389
Likes: 2
cpa Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 389
Likes: 2
Good question. It''s always seemed to me that cast off and the cheekpiece were working at cross purposes. Looking forward to comments.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 372
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 372
Originally Posted by cpa
Good question. It''s always seemed to me that cast off and the cheekpiece were working at cross purposes. Looking forward to comments.

Not really though. The cheek piece keeps your face where it needs to be with respect to the rib and the bead or the rifle sights as the case may be. The cast off, while allowing for that, puts the buttplate where it needs to be on your shoulder. Sometimes we make do with a sort of average cast off on an uncheeked stock that is a tradeoff between those two demands. But the cheek piece allows greater independence in these two things.


_________
BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,127
Likes: 1126
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,127
Likes: 1126
This is just personal opinion, no more. I am not a rifle stockmaker, though I have made them, and am mostly just a rifle and shotgun shooter. But, it seems to me that many classic rifle stockers want(ed) to include a cheekpiece. When a cheekpiece is included on a stock it offsets the eye. The only way to get the eye back to the bore line/sight line is to build in cast off. It works, as you said, in tandem with a cheekpiece, because one offsets the other. I don't really understand the purpose of a cheekpiece, myself, except for aesthetics. I have rifles that work perfectly with open sights that have no cheekpiece, or cast.

As long as my eye aligns with the sights, without physical contortions, I don't care if the stock has a cheek piece or not. I really believe cheekpieces are mostly about aesthetics. But, that's just my opinion.


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,710
Likes: 730
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,710
Likes: 730
I don’t own a rifle with a cheek piece. Maybe it helps with cheek weld to the stock on bigger recoiling guns?

Don’t know for sure.

Best,
Ted

Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 15
Boxlock
Offline
Boxlock

Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 15
Ideally for the line of sight, in regards to stock design, the stock will need to be designed for either open sights or scope use. A compromise will detract from the optimal use of either design. An example would be using a low comb for open sights and a higher comb for a good cheek weld with a scope. You can't have both, one or the other.
Modern adjustable combs can provide versatility, but that's not applicable for your build. Good luck.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 191
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 191
I have prewar custom rifles with cheekpieces and they are so comfortable that I want a shotgun similarly equipped. However, they somehow conflict with quick mounting in the use of a shotgun. I have not found a solution to the "iron sights/optical sights" problem. I only know that a stock has to be low enough to use the iron sights, and the shooter has to adjust to the scope. A talented stockmaker could probably make a stock that has a point on the comb area that would allow a tight fit with the cheek to use the scope, and still allow use of the iron sights.

Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 886
Likes: 350
Sidelock
Online Content
Sidelock

Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 886
Likes: 350
A “point on the comb” can be a mixed blessing with any degree of recoil.

I had a Manton of Calcutta .500 BPE BLNE that had been quite tidily restocked in India.

The front end of the comb had been neatly finished with a pronounced corner, fluted on each side.It bit!

As it was not the original stock I had no qualms about getting it re-shaped to a less aggressive contour.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,693
Likes: 450
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,693
Likes: 450
I have noticed that almost all guns with a cheek piece would have too much castoff if you removed the cheek piece.

1 member likes this: Stanton Hillis
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.100s Queries: 37 (0.066s) Memory: 0.8467 MB (Peak: 1.8988 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 12:30:08 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS