May
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
7 members (Ted Schefelbein, Tim Wolf, Jolly Bill, R. Glenz, Upland 28, 1 invisible), 1,145 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,504
Posts545,540
Members14,414
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
LeFusil Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
Is anyone here familiar with this type ejector mechanism? Looks to be an odd mix of a Deeley box and southgate system. Any known issues-quirks-etc with this type system?

https://patents.google.com/patent/US491270A/en


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]

1 member likes this: Stanton Hillis
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
mc Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
Looks like something cogswell and Harrison would use

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 748
Sidelock
**
Online Content
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 748
Dustin,
Perhaps reach out to “gunman”, I’d bet he knows it off the top of his head. The only guess I’d have is a variation of the more well known “box” ejector systems.

Was a Perks box system somewhat similar? Sorry, when I have a question about English stuff, I ask you, usually.

Best,
Ted

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
LeFusil Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
Originally Posted by mc
Looks like something cogswell and Harrison would use


What’s that supposed to mean?

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
LeFusil Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
Originally Posted by Ted Schefelbein
Dustin,
Perhaps reach out to “gunman”, I’d bet he knows it off the top of his head. The only guess I’d have is a variation of the more well known “box” ejector systems.

Was a Perks box system somewhat similar? Sorry, when I have a question about English stuff, I ask you, usually.

Best,
Ted

Hey Ted. I’ve got some inquiries out to some really knowledgeable guys in the trade. So far….Bupkis.
This is not like a Perkes. Perkes uses very complex (aka nightmaresish) springs of varying design.

This system is somewhat complex, the “wings” you see are the “rotary sears”. A friend who looked at the system, says it reminds him of an LC Smith action cocking system. I can see the resemblance. It’s obviously very well made and took real mechanical ability to even come up with the idea, let alone make the damn thing. From my reading up on John Ross, he was a worker in the trade, and highly regarded. He possibly even did action work at a few of the big London names. I’ve seen some guns bearing his name while doing some research and they all seem to be of very high quality.
Charles Osborne, prolific maker to the trade must’ve like his system, I’ve seen a few guns that use this unique ejector work while I’ve been researching the system.
I can say It still throws empty cases with authority after 110+ years with no sign of being repaired. I guess that’s a win even if Cogswell & Harrison made it, which they didn’t.

1 member likes this: Ted Schefelbein
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,271
Likes: 202
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,271
Likes: 202
A friend has a John Ross marked sle. It is of the quality in fit and finish equal to my Purdey. Some time ago I tried to search about John Ross, and possibly I remember that there were two gun fellows with that name.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

From Internet Gun Club======
In 1890 he registered three patents Nos. 1955, 14886 and 19395. The first patent covered an ejector mechanism which was cocked when the gun was opened. A T shaped lever positioned on its side in the fore-end and pivoted transversely had a friction reducing roller on its downward leg which rode over a cam on the knuckle. This raised the forward limb which engaged with and compressed the ejector spring. The third limb was the extractor cam. No know examples exist. Both patents detailed two ejector mechanisms and a number of tripping mechanisms.

Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 11/21/23 10:52 AM.
1 member likes this: LeFusil
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
LeFusil Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
Good info Daryl. Thank you.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
mc Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
Cogswell and Harrison had a unique ejectors system of I am remembering correctly

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
LeFusil Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 525
Originally Posted by mc
Cogswell and Harrison had a unique ejectors system of I am remembering correctly

Yes, they did. The Avant Tout box. This is nothing like that.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
mc Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
Yes it's much more complex with a lot of parts at the time the Southgate and deeley ejectors were available Southgate with a spring and tumbler deeley with six or so parts good luck on your quest for information

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.082s Queries: 38 (0.055s) Memory: 0.8522 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-06 03:33:38 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS