|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,138
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,469
Posts545,142
Members14,409
| |
Most Online1,299
Apr 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
Jack, I'm new at this...are you saying it does not look to be a number 2? How about the engraving? Is that similar? It is a gun from 1955 or 1958, if that matters. Can't remember which gun is which date(i have them in my notes, but they are put up with the guns at the moment)
Gary
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812 |
Engraving is similar near as I can tell. Arcaded fences the same. Seven pin and detachable locks the same. Aguirre y Aranzabal engraved on lockplates on my 1980s gun; not on yours. Engraving and physical design can change. I'm saying I don't have a good grasp on features which would distinguish 1 from 2 from 117. Think ChiefSG is correct that it's not a model 53. I've never seen one except in fotos but the engraving on a 53 does appear to have some "definition". Engraving on a No.2 looks like kudzu; it's everywhere but not going anywhere, not really taking your eye to a destination
jack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Boxlock
|
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
I'd have to agree. I've always thought it a No2, but when I saw a photo of a 53 the other day, I started wondering what I really had. I have a Victor Sarasqueta of the same era. I got them both from an elderly gentelman in southern Spain when I was stationed there. I honostly didn't know anything about them, I just liked the way they looked and I new I couldn't go wrong with the price. thanks for your input.
Gary
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,064
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,064 |
Gary, we'd appreciate it if you'd post some photos of your Victor Sarasqueta 4E. Thanks. Chopperlump
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Boxlock
|
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
chopperlump,
I'll break it out tomorrow after work, now that I know how to post, I'll try to take some decent pics.
Gary
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
I pulled out my Model 117 and can confirm yours is not this model. As near as I can tell from the information and photos I have it's a Model 2. I don't know how much variation there has been in the engraving over the years and I'm basically going by the amount of coverage.
Jim
Last edited by italiansxs; 09/13/09 11:45 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
Gary,
I think it is an AYA Nº51, a pigeon gun (filed flat band, engraving and cruciform trigger plate like mine Nº51). Please check whether it has the Purdey "Third Bite", if it does, sure it is.
EJSXS
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1 |
Hello Gary, Here is a 53 for your reference (gold washed innards and all):   JC
Last edited by JayCee; 09/14/09 02:46 PM.
"...it is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance." Charles Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 142
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 142 |
Gary,
You are getting very good advice from many people here. I would also add that it may be a model produced for the domestic market and not be a familiar model here in the US. It looks nicer than a number 2 and is definitely not a number 53.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,642 Likes: 1 |
Does anyone know why "AYA Jeff" is not posting anymore? He was the absolute expert
on AYAs and had a lot of old catalogues.
JC
"...it is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance." Charles Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
