S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,547
Posts546,144
Members14,423
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683 |
I have seen two guns that were IMO overstocked. One was an L.C. Smith field grade that had been restocked with an incredible piece of wood which hadn't been checkered. It looked like a bum wearing a pair of spitshined shoes.
The other I can't remember except the guy paid a large amount money (according to him) for a pretty ordinary O/U. This was a work in progress.
I think, but don't know, that original fine guns of the past two centuries had great wood, but nothing spectacular (my definition of spectacular.) Look at them and you'll see what I mean. I believe this was because of a Victorian sense of taste: they liked nice, but not spectacular in their personal items.
I'm not degrading Best Grade old guns, I think they're wonderful, but I just think they reflected the tastes of their times, which was more conservative, whereas modern stocks reflect the tastes of our times, which tend to be more razzle-dazzle. Am I wrong in this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88 |
Most of the Westley Richards that I've seen/owned had much better than ordinary wood even on the lower grades. But I do know what you mean about looking too tarted up for the gun.
Last edited by Mike Harrell; 03/20/11 11:26 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
Better a fancy piece of wood on a ordinary gun, than a fancy piece of wood on a ordinary piece of furniture. 'no such thing as too pretty...' Everybody likes a tart now and then.
I only object to the wood finish itself being out of place. Most "tart" fancy wood also gets super gloss finish. It'd be much more fitting if it had original finish.
Last edited by Chuck H; 03/20/11 11:23 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
I'm not without a "tart" or two myself. A common 12g A grade and this on a Nitro Special
Last edited by Chuck H; 03/20/11 11:29 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,190 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,190 Likes: 15 |
I have a Syracuse era LC Smith 10-gauge F Grade hammer gun (lowest quality) with original stunning stock wood that should have been reserved for only the highest grade Smith guns; and also have a G Grade LeFever with original stock wood way above G quality; and I've seen other similar examples over the years. By the same token, I've seen more than my share of high-grade American double guns will relatively plain and disappointing wood; I suppose folks then are very much as they are now, we all have different tastes when it comes to what we enjoy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683 |
I wouldn't say either of the guns pictured are excessive. However, I think, and have seen, guns that were way overboard for what they were.
The other thing is age and oil adds a patina to wood (it gets darker)so it doesn't look so flamboyant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812 |
Fads in the aftermarket (the stocks of California custom rifles come to mind) are one thing. What a production maker has on hand in terms of dried blanks or can get at the moment largely determines what gets worked to go on a gun so there is bound to be some high grade wood "wasted" on field grades and some plain Jane on higher grades. Anyone who knows the Morton Salt/FN story knows that demand often outruns supply and expediency in correction of the deficit can be a disaster. Personally, I think stocks with a lot of figure and no checkering are a dead giveaway of the amateur reach that exceeds grasp. Still why anyone would dislike pretty wood on a utilitarian gun is beyond me.
jack
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
I have been saving this piece to tart up a plain gun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 82 |
Oh Man Chuck.....that is nice. And the grain flow up through the grip! Will kick a$$ on any gun. We carved a simalar blank for one of them Disco Decade SKBs one time.....aint ashamed of it either. What are you fixin' to put it on? As always, Hoping this finds everyone well; kraft
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
Kraft, I haven't found a gun worthy yet.
|
|
|
|
|