S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,504
Posts545,552
Members14,416
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 447
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 447 |
Anyone have feedback on the RBL Launch Edition 20 ga guns -- good or bad? Did the single or double triggers have any issues, or fit and finish that improved or degraded in later year productions, ect? General estimated prices (PM or email me if preferred)? Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683 |
I've got one and it works just fine. Double triggers, case hardened finish. I don't have any later models to compare it to. The wood is very dark, well figured, but not spectaculary contrasted.
I had a problem with the forend being slightly loose, sent it back and they fixed it very quickly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,893 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,893 Likes: 110 |
I've been very pleased with all four of my RBLs, all straight grip double trigger with 4x wood. I didn't like the very shiny wood finish on the early Launch Edition's, but fortunately mine was later and had the duller finish, and I also got the extra-cost color case hardened finished receiver. So, it more closely matches my later RBLs. The trigger pulls on my Launch Edition 20-gauge are just a tad heavier than I like for shooting clay targets, but I never notice shooting birds. I've shot my RBL-16 more than the other three, and in that I have a huge supply of 1 1/8 ounce #6 shot 16-gauge shells, it has become my go to Pheasant gun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 292
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 292 |
I have a ST, PG, BTF, Exhibition wood 20ga that I have shot a lot and have had -0- problems.
A Springer Spaniel, a 6# double and a fair day to hunt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
I have a RBL 20 and 28. Very happy with both guns, with a slight preference for the 28. No issues with fit and finish or function.
Both are CCH actions with DT/SFE/SG. I got a set of 30" barrels with the 28 which are real nice for that gauge - not sure if they are available or advisable for the 20, which is a bit heavier and has the adjustable chokes.
Last edited by Doverham; 05/04/11 07:31 PM.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105 |
I saw a very early launch edition 20 with an SST that did not function properly. But I think they worked out most of the issues before long, and you often see a lot of praise for their customer service when there is a problem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 336 |
I have a Launch Edition with case-colored receiver, single trigger, pistol grip, and beavertail forend, exhibition Turkish with the gloss finish, s.n. 20. It is a beautiful gun. I have shot it for several dove seasons with no problems whatsoever. I will say that the later Launch Edition guns I have seen have better engraving than mine.
I also have an RBL12 in the same configuration with 32" bbls. that is a clays killer. I have also used it on doves with great success. Everyone that sees it comments on the wood, which is exhibition Turkish also. Zero problems of any kind.
I just bought a 28 ga. RBL in the same configuration as the above two guns, with 30" bbls., at the Southern SxS that is having the chokes opened and will be shipped next week. Looking forward to shooting it soon. JR
Last edited by John Roberts; 05/04/11 08:21 PM.
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683 |
I think the shiny stock finish was an extra. Mine has a duller finish too, and I prefer that. Mine weighs 5.8 pounds.
The "coin finish" guns were less expensive but fewer were made. They look kinda good.
I was not the original purchaser of my gun, but it was unfired. Not that that matters, I'm a used gun guy, and I got a great deal on it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,096 Likes: 336 |
Never understood why anyone would want a "dull" finish on their gunstocks. I'm no fan of a thick, heavy epoxy/plastic finish, but a nicely done gloss finish, or a shiny semi-gloss, is much nicer than a no-gloss flat oil finish. Dull is good word to describe it. JR
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683 |
It's not a flat finish, it's semi-shiny, just not deep gloss. One could slap on a few coats of oil and it would be deeply glossly, but that's not what I want.
|
|
|
|
|