doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Two Different Worlds

Assuming the incumbent were successfully returned in twentytwelve and unrestrained by further political ambitions, how exactly would he enact his anti-gun program in the face of a republi-con majority in the house and a distinctly unfriendly court? C'mon, tell us, Jim.

jack

For someone who professes to be so brilliant that it is a waste of time to debate with us mere mortals (ref. the Global Warming thread, post #272140), you sure are stupid. I distinctly acknowledged that there are liberal gun owners... just not as many as conservatives. Once again, you attempt to mischaracterize what I've said. Again I ask the jury; stupid, or dishonest?

I also never said my opinion is the only valid one. I provided facts to refute your opinion that Obama is not a threat to gun rights. You, on the other hand, have provided nothing to show that he is anything but a threat to the Second Amendment. This is what you always do. That is what I promised to continue to spotlight and expose. That is my point. Joe McCarthy was ultimately, mostly proven wrong. Soooo... prove me wrong. Put up or shut up.

...and the dance of the Gnomoron continues.

Uh, jack, I know I'm not Jim but I've got to jump in on this. First, can you guarantee that we'll have a distinctly unfriendly "republi-con" majority in the House, or the Senate? Second, can you guarantee that Obama will not get the chance to appoint any more gun-unfriendly Supreme or Federal Court justices? Third, have you perhaps heard of the possible consequences to Second Amendment rights if Obama should ratify the U.N. Small Arms treaty?

Shall I go on? How about gun and hunting bans on federal lands via executive order, thus circumventing Congress? Perhaps more under the radar illegal ops like Fast and Furious? Or Justice department support for more frivilous lawsuits designed to injure or bankrupt the firearms industry? Or environmental regulations or consumer protections regulations designed to make shooting prohibitively expensive? Or using our hard earned tax dollars to fund more anti-gun studies via HHS and AMA?

All of that was just off the top of my head. I know there are many other possibilities. Sorry if I stole any of your thunder Jim.

Keith, try to read what people write without spinning it into what you think they really meant to say.

Keep up the good work!

I wouldn't be surprised if over 30% of doublegun owners are liberals.

Maybe we should ask people's opinions of this figure to determine what the percentage actually is.

A) Please explain what you are trying to say in the quote above. I am neither a mind reader nor as brilliant as you. So far, it is you who has been mis-quoting and twisting what people say.

B) As per my previous reply directed at you... put up or shut up.

There is nothing that I write that should elicit your ad hominem comments and asides. The most charitable explanation is that you may be reading things into my statements.

It is simply my opinion (1) that a lot of liberals own guns and (2) that the Obama administration cannot change 2A. That is my opinion. You do not have to like it. I do not care if you do or if you don't.

By the way, do you think liberals owning DGs could be as high as 40%?

The reply above could prompt Dave Weber to institute random drug testing for DoubleGunshop contributors.

No guarantees, Keith, but be advised who gets your goat may not be who gets your guns. The Jim & Dave Show was around in 2008 making the same predictions should Obama be elected. They aren't worried in the least about the accuracy of their predictions. They just love screaming fire in an empty theatre and I think this one is just about to turn off the marquee and lock up. You guys almost can't find anyone to argue with you any more. What a joke.

jack