S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (smlekid),
893
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,498
Posts545,402
Members14,412
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
larryguy
Unregistered
|
larryguy
Unregistered
|
I've read Dr. Jones book and have asked this question before, but I seek information from our British cousins on this subject - do you/have you/are you experiencing issues when using fiber(re) wadded cartridges in bore sizes larger than standard i.e say .735 - .740 vs. .719/.729? I have been told by UK users - "Nah, not a problem do it all the time in my old guns". Others, including Dr. Jones say it can be a problem with gas blow by and shot balling. Observations, comments, experiences please.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105 |
Not Brit Larry . . . but I've measured at least a couple Parker 12's that were close to .750. And of course they were all pre-plastic wad days. Should be some guys out there with classic American guns that could also comment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9 |
When loading brass hulls you use the next larger gauge, 11's for 12 bore, 9 for 10. ect. I believe this should indicate it's ok. I shot a Parker 10 loaded with 3.5 drams 2F and 1.25 oz lead at bluebills for years, WOW, !! bill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I am of the opinion that wad designation has changed over the years. Some old recommendations I have read stated for loading BP in brass shells to use 2 sizes larger wads while for smokeless in paper hulls to use 1 size larger. Th first shells I loaded in the late 1950s were all loaded with card & fiber wads. I also loaded for a muzzle loader for which I had to order oversize wads (11ga). The thing I noted though was the standard 12ga wads measured about .750" while the 11ga ones went to around .770" or close to actual 10ga size. I am highly suspicious that those early directions calling for 1 & 2 sizes larger were actually refering to what we today would call 12 & 11 ga wads. I also at that point in time loaded for a 20ga using brass shells for which my wads were marked 18, but don't recall the actual diameter of them. The muzzl loader had bores which measured about .750 & the regular 1ga wads did not give a good seal. Patterns improved considerably when I switched to the larger wads.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,688 Likes: 31
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,688 Likes: 31 |
I have occasionally experienced a 'duff' cartridge, but it is very rarely. I shoot a Miroku with bores of 0.740" I never really worry unduly about fibre wad cartridges, I just buy them and shoot them, without issues. Dr. Jones as written a lot of words, and done a lot of patterning, and made a lot of observations, some say conclusions.There are those that shoot, and there are those that write. Maybe more of us would be anal if we thought about it a bit more, but life's too short, get out there and do things.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
I agree with Salopian, the pressure of firing seems to expand the wads the fraction they need, much in the manner that the Minie bullet used to work.
No more writing, I'll get out and do something!
Last edited by Small Bore; 06/23/12 09:32 AM.
|
|
|
|
|