October
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
6 members (Eric 375, AZMike, SamW, David Williamson, sxsman1, 1 invisible), 114 guests, and 9 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics36,227
Posts509,127
Members14,089
Most Online462
Aug 5th, 2016
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#384867 11/20/14 12:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 13
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 13
I recommend Andy Borowizt's column in The New Yorker, GOP Unveils New Immigration Plan." We must make America somewhere no one wants to live."


Bill Ferguson
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 17
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 17
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
....GOP Unveils New Immigration Plan." We must make America somewhere no one wants to live."


I suppose, even without hearing the 'plan', you already support the pres. in whatever he comes up with later today.

Why's this coming up now? He'll be the same 'emperor', his word, in January. Hope it'll make you feel better that your guy wants to take us into Thanksgiving bad mouthing a good chunk of 'his' citizens.

If he has a little energy, what would stop him from propping up sagging ocare popularity. You're on his side and will take whatever comes out of his mouth. I noticed you stepped out of the ss 'discussion'. Out of sight out of mind for some does not mean the Social Security Disability Ins problem goes away.

Are you waiting for him to 'blame' R's in '15 for hating the poor and crippled, so you can come back with another TEA Party reference. Why don't you hold his feet to the fire to address an issue that's near and dear to your heart. I'm not worried about the sofa queens, I'm referring to the legitimate in need that he'll turn into a political football in a few months.

Do you like that he went to Australia and talked US domestic politics, and bad mouthed his own and the host country. Leadership?

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
here are 22 Times Obama said he could not do what he is doing, be careful Rky,when the Dems Dirty Harry changed the Senate rule to help them when in power are now going to help the R's and the same will go for President Cruz !



1. “I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with [the president] trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all
. And that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” (3/31/08)

2. “We’ve got a government designed by the Founders so that there’d be checks and balances. You don’t want a president who’s too powerful or a Congress that’s too powerful or a court that’s too powerful. Everybody’s got their own role. Congress’s job is to pass legislation. The president can veto it or he can sign it. … I believe in the Constitution and I will obey the Constitution of the United States. We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end-run around Congress.” (5/19/08)

3. “Comprehensive reform, that’s how we’re going to solve this problem. … Anybody who tells you it’s going to be easy or that I can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn’t been paying attention to how this town works.” (5/5/10)

4. “[T]here are those in the immigrants’ rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws. … I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally. Ultimately, our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship. And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable.” (7/1/10)

5. “I do have an obligation to make sure that I am following some of the rules. I can’t simply ignore laws that are out there. I’ve got to work to make sure that they are changed.” (10/14/10)

6. “I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself. We have a system of government that requires the Congress to work with the Executive Branch to make it happen. I’m committed to making it happen, but I’ve got to have some partners to do it. … The main thing we have to do to stop deportations is to change the laws. … [T]he most important thing that we can do is to change the law because the way the system works – again, I just want to repeat, I’m president, I’m not king. If Congress has laws on the books that says that people who are here who are not documented have to be deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of where we deploy our resources, to focus on people who are really causing problems as a opposed to families who are just trying to work and support themselves. But there’s a limit to the discretion that I can show because I am obliged to execute the law. That’s what the Executive Branch means. I can’t just make the laws up by myself. So the most important thing that we can do is focus on changing the underlying laws.” (10/25/10)

7. “America is a nation of laws, which means I, as the President, am obligated to enforce the law. I don’t have a choice about that. That’s part of my job. But I can advocate for changes in the law so that we have a country that is both respectful of the law but also continues to be a great nation of immigrants. … With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed …. [W]e’ve got three branches of government. Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is to enforce and implement those laws. And then the judiciary has to interpret the laws. There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.” (3/28/11)

8. “I can’t solve this problem by myself. … [W]e’re going to have to have bipartisan support in order to make it happen. … I can’t do it by myself. We’re going to have to change the laws in Congress, but I’m confident we can make it happen.” (4/20/11)

9. “I know some here wish that I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how democracy works. See, democracy is hard. But it’s right. Changing our laws means doing the hard work of changing minds and changing votes, one by one.” (4/29/11)

10. “Sometimes when I talk to immigration advocates, they wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works. What we really need to do is to keep up the fight to pass genuine, comprehensive reform. That is the ultimate solution to this problem. That’s what I’m committed to doing.” (5/10/11)

11. “I swore an oath to uphold the laws on the books …. Now, I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own. Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.” (7/25/11)

12. “So what we’ve tried to do is within the constraints of the laws on the books, we’ve tried to be as fair, humane, just as we can, recognizing, though, that the laws themselves need to be changed. … The most important thing for your viewers and listeners and readers to understand is that in order to change our laws, we’ve got to get it through the House of Representatives, which is currently controlled by Republicans, and we’ve got to get 60 votes in the Senate. … Administratively, we can’t ignore the law. … I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true. We are doing everything we can administratively. But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books that I have to enforce. And I think there’s been a great disservice done to the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can go and do these things. It’s just not true. … We live in a democracy. You have to pass bills through the legislature, and then I can sign it. And if all the attention is focused away from the legislative process, then that is going to lead to a constant dead-end. We have to recognize how the system works, and then apply pressure to those places where votes can be gotten and, ultimately, we can get this thing solved.” (9/28/11)

In June 2012, President Obama unilaterally granted deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA), allowing “eligible individuals who do not present a risk to national security or public safety … to request temporary relief from deportation proceedings and apply for work authorization.” He then argued that he had already done everything he could legally do on his own:

1. “Now, what I’ve always said is, as the head of the executive branch, there’s a limit to what I can do. Part of the reason that deportations went up was Congress put a whole lot of money into it, and when you have a lot of resources and a lot more agents involved, then there are going to be higher numbers. What we’ve said is, let’s make sure that you’re not misdirecting those resources. But we’re still going to, ultimately, have to change the laws in order to avoid some of the heartbreaking stories that you see coming up occasionally. And that’s why this continues to be a top priority of mine. … And we will continue to make sure that how we enforce is done as fairly and justly as possible. But until we have a law in place that provides a pathway for legalization and/or citizenship for the folks in question, we’re going to continue to be bound by the law. … And so part of the challenge as President is constantly saying, ‘what authorities do I have?’” (9/20/12)

2. “We are a nation of immigrants. … But we’re also a nation of laws.
So what I’ve said is, we need to fix a broken immigration system. And I’ve done everything that I can on my own[.]” (10/16/12)

3. “I’m not a king. I am the head of the executive branch of government. I’m required to follow the law. And that’s what we’ve done. But what I’ve also said is, let’s make sure that we’re applying the law in a way that takes into account people’s humanity. That’s the reason that we moved forward on deferred action. Within the confines of the law we said, we have some discretion in terms of how we apply this law.” (1/30/13)

4. “I’m not a king. You know, my job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law. And, you know, when it comes to enforcement of our immigration laws, we’ve got some discretion. We can prioritize what we do. But we can’t simply ignore the law. When it comes to the dreamers, we were able to identify that group and say, ‘These folks are generally not a risk. They’re not involved in crime. … And so let’s prioritize our enforcement resources.’ But to sort through all the possible cases of everybody who might have a sympathetic story to tell is very difficult to do. This is why we need comprehensive immigration reform. To make sure that once and for all, in a way that is, you know, ratified by Congress, we can say that there is a pathway to citizenship for people who are staying out of trouble, who are trying to do the right thing, who’ve put down roots here. … My job is to carry out the law. And so Congress gives us a whole bunch of resources. They give us an order that we’ve got to go out there and enforce the laws that are on the books. … If this was an issue that I could do unilaterally I would have done it a long time ago. … The way our system works is Congress has to pass legislation. I then get an opportunity to sign it and implement it.” (1/30/13)

5. “This is something I’ve struggled with throughout my presidency. The problem is that I’m the president of the United States, I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed. And Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system. And what that means is that we have certain obligations to enforce the laws that are in place even if we think that in many cases the results may be tragic.” (2/14/13)

6. “I think that it is very important for us to recognize that the way to solve this problem has to be legislative. I can do some things and have done some things that make a difference in the lives of people by determining how our enforcement should focus. … And we’ve been able to provide help through deferred action for young people …. But this is a problem that needs to be fixed legislatively.” (7/16/13)

7. “My job in the executive branch is supposed to be to carry out the laws that are passed. Congress has said ‘here is the law’ when it comes to those who are undocumented, and they’ve allocated a whole bunch of money for enforcement. And, what I have been able to do is to make a legal argument that I think is absolutely right, which is that given the resources that we have, we can’t do everything that Congress has asked us to do. What we can do is then carve out the DREAM Act folks, saying young people who have basically grown up here are Americans that we should welcome. … But if we start broadening that, then essentially I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally. So that’s not an option. … What I’ve said is there is a there’s a path to get this done, and that’s through Congress.” (9/17/13)

8. “[I]f, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing laws in Congress, then I would do so. But we’re also a nation of laws. That’s part of our tradition. And so the easy way out is to try to yell and pretend like I can do something by violating our laws. And what I’m proposing is the harder path, which is to use our democratic processes to achieve the same goal that you want to achieve. … It is not simply a matter of us just saying we’re going to violate the law. That’s not our tradition. The great thing about this country is we have this wonderful process of democracy, and sometimes it is messy, and sometimes it is hard, but ultimately, justice and truth win out.” (11/25/13)

9. “I am the Champion-in-Chief of comprehensive immigration reform. But what I’ve said in the past remains true, which is until Congress passes a new law, then I am constrained in terms of what I am able to do. What I’ve done is to use my prosecutorial discretion, because you can’t enforce the laws across the board for 11 or 12 million people, there aren’t the resources there. What we’ve said is focus on folks who are engaged in criminal activity, focus on people who are engaged in gang activity. Do not focus on young people, who we’re calling DREAMers …. That already stretched my administrative capacity very far. But I was confident that that was the right thing to do. But at a certain point the reason that these deportations are taking place is, Congress said, ‘you have to enforce these laws.’ They fund the hiring of officials at the department that’s charged with enforcing. And I cannot ignore those laws any more than I could ignore, you know, any of the other laws that are on the books. That’s why it’s so important for us to get comprehensive immigration reform done this year.” (3/6/14)

10. “I think that I never have a green light [to push the limits of executive power]. I’m bound by the Constitution; I’m bound by separation of powers. There are some things we can’t do. Congress has the power of the purse, for example. … Congress has to pass a budget and authorize spending. So I don’t have a green light. … My preference in all these instances is to work with Congress, because not only can Congress do more, but it’s going to be longer-lasting.” (8/6/14)


Hillary For Prison 2018
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,499
Likes: 22
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,499
Likes: 22
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
I recommend Andy Borowizt's column in The New Yorker, GOP Unveils New Immigration Plan." We must make America somewhere no one wants to live."


The peak of illegal immigration occured prior to Obama taking office-he has done quite well at making sure the economy is bad enough that those who show up won't find any work. And, that word has gotten out. But, he also did get the word out, that, in countries other than Mexico, that if residents could get their kids here, the adults could come later. And stay.

Nobody would force their minor kids to go it alone on a border crossing without some assurance thay would be re-united with them.

Nobody.

I believe we need to mine the first 500 yards of the American side of the US and Mexican border. It won't be secure until we do this. And if the border isn't secure, there is nothing else to talk about.


Best,
Ted

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 2
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 2
trouble is both sides like the illegals....conservative businessmen like to get the cheap/slave labor wages that illegals will work for...plus the way it drives down wages of legal citizens....liberals want to save the world no matter what it costs conservatives and the rest of the country, plus all the added democrat voting hoarded masses...

no matter how you look at it Americas working middle class looses...


gunut
gunut #384881 11/20/14 01:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Obama’s Amnesty Will Add As Many Foreign Workers As New Jobs Since 2009

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/20/obamas...obs-since-2009/

President Barack Obama’s unilateral amnesty will quickly add as many foreign workers to the nation’s legal labor force as the total number of new jobs created by his economy since 2009


Hillary For Prison 2018
gunut #384887 11/20/14 02:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,374
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,374
Originally Posted By: gunut
trouble is both sides like the illegals....conservative businessmen like to get the cheap/slave labor wages that illegals will work for...plus the way it drives down wages of legal citizens....liberals want to save the world no matter what it costs conservatives and the rest of the country, plus all the added democrat voting hoarded masses...

no matter how you look at it Americas working middle class looses...


Bingo.

It looks like the only folks that will benefit from amnesty are democratic politicians. Ok, legalized aliens also benefit but we don't care about that.

gunut #384927 11/20/14 06:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 17
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 17
Originally Posted By: gunut
....conservative businessmen like to get the cheap/slave labor wages that illegals will work for...plus the way it drives down wages of legal citizens....

....no matter how you look at it Americas working middle class looses...


I dunno. By most accounts, illegals are able to live better in the US than their mex home towns, and send money to mexico for family to use on top of that. The activists want to hope-n-change it, but I don't know if the illegal felons want their gravy train stalled by regs and labor laws. They're going to be stuck with the same smoke n mirror stats that joe middle class figures out just ain't as good as it used to be.

I'd doubt these illegals are putting on suits or punching time clocks on assembly lines. They're doing stuff that no one else wants to, and they're attracted to those jobs. The middle class wants big benny packages and nine to five that their kids are suppose to pay for when they go into the 'labor' force. That's drying up because it just isn't there.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 22
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 22
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein

I believe we need to mine the first 500 yards of the American side of the US and Mexican border. It won't be secure until we do this. And if the border isn't secure, there is nothing else to talk about.


Best,
Ted


Exactly

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 13
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 13
Ted, When children were pouring across the border, why didn't you volunteer to take your varmint rifle to Arizona and do your patriotic duty to defend your country?


Bill Ferguson
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2021 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.058s Queries: 35 (0.024s) Memory: 0.8838 MB (Peak: 1.8990 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2021-10-23 11:44:01 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS