S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
442
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,466
Posts545,088
Members14,409
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 674
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 674 |
getting my first pair of prescription shooting glasses. i wear prism glasses with no-line bi-focals all day, every day. they are a mild script and i used to never shoot with them. could not hit ANYTHING!!!! i started wearing my glasses and i am killing almost every quail i shoot at.
the last thing i need to decide is how to handle the bi-focals.. my question to Rx shooting glass wearers is this - what are your experiences and advice on:
1.do you get the cheaters put in your shooting glasses
2.old-fashioned hard-lined bi-focals
3.progressive no-line bi-focals
4.do you put bifocals only in your non-dominant eye?
thank you very much for your help.
skunk out
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
I just received my first pair of Ranger Rx shooting glasses. I have been shooting with contacts, but recently realized they don't do as well at distances as prescription glasses.
I was too cheap to do progressives and didn't honestly see the need, so I ordered the flat top bifocals. I have not had a chance to test them yet, though.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 976
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 976 |
I shot with progressives. A little getting used to, but would not change now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 879
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 879 |
Flat topped, set low in the lens, to stay out of the way when looking thru the top
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718 Likes: 479
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718 Likes: 479 |
I use no line in everything. It took a little while to get use to them. On shooting glasses I have the correction set lower. First set I was still using part of the progressive near correction part of the lens when I mounted the gun. Think about the rib being in focus near or far as a distraction. I want the end of the gun in decent focus and the bird in clear focus. Solution was to move the edge of the distance vision down several mm's. Now when I mount the gun I can see clearly now. I still miss but that is due to operator error.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
I've been on progressives for 20 years. I shoot just fine with them, but still cannot get the hang of walking through the woods with them on. I have a pair of single visions set on my hi-power script. for real hunting and a pair of low rise flat tops for long reading sessions. Works for me...Geo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,982 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,982 Likes: 106 |
I think bi-focals are fine for clay pigeons, but for hunting, esp in a woods, they suck. I'm not talking progressive lens, but true bi-focals. I wasn't aware of shooting glasses with progressive lens. If they exist, I wouldn't mind trying a pair for hunting, but not bi-focals. Bi-focals make for tough walking from blurry vision and give me a headache, and make me almost dizzy.
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
After wearing these Rangers Rx with bifocals for 5 mins, there is no way I would spend a day with them on in the woods. They will work fine for the range, but the distortion is too much to deal with in heavy cover. The bifocal was a FT 28, which ended being bigger than I expected.
I have readers in a pair of nonRx sunglasses that I use all the time with contacts and I barely notice them except when I need them. Bifocals on top of a Rx lens is a very different creature!
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 496 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 496 Likes: 12 |
I use progressives for every day and had I pair of line bifocals made for shooting with the "close" correction set very low. I like the set up very much and do hunt with them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,748 Likes: 743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,748 Likes: 743 |
I've had standard "line" bifocals for perhaps a decade. Hunt with them, shoot with them, wear them all the time. If you don't wear them all the time, you won't get used to using them as intended, and it will cause you problems.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|