March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
3 members (R. Glenz, Ted Schefelbein, 1 invisible), 287 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,373
Posts543,977
Members14,389
Most Online1,131
Jan 21st, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 29 of 37 1 2 27 28 29 30 31 36 37
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
The Latest Poll on "Gun Control"! We're winning but the anti's will IMO NEVER give up.
Jim

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-fi...article/2563304


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Obama's Fast track on Trade Proposal:

Information on this Bill S995 is sketchy at this point and the details are being kept secret just like with Obamacare but I'll post one very important point being reported that if it's the case will have a severe impact on our 2nd Amendment rights:



"Seven: Over The Next Six Years, There Is Ample Time To Insert Firearms Import Bans (With The Force Of Statutory Law) Into The TPP, The EU Agreement, or A Separate Trade Agreement For That Purpose.

Barack Obama has been rabid in his zeal to destroy the Second Amendment community. Over and over again, he has experimented with a wide variety of schemes to ban guns by regulatory fiat: eliminating credit, banning ammunition, compiling a gun registry, encouraging state bans, reclassifying common guns, banning the import of guns, and so forth. And yet, Hatch and Ryan didn't see fit to even purport to prohibit the Obama administration from using a trade agreement to impose a statutory gun import ban."

The above was reported in Town Hall and you can read the complete article here:

http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelha...91040/page/full
Jim

Last edited by James M; 05/13/15 01:33 AM.

The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
I am truly sorry for this families loss of their daughter because of the theater shooting by a madman in Colorado.
However; I am NOT sorry for the $280,000 and counting they now owe when they attempted to sue the manufacturers and lost in court. In Colorado if you lose this type of suit you are responsible for the defendants legal fees. My understanding is the Brady Bunch put them up to this. And why not? Sarah Brady made an excellent living being a "paid victim" for over 30 years.
Jim
http://www.guns.com/2015/04/23/aurora-theater-victims-family-may-owe-280000-in-lucky-gunner-lawsuit/


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
Here is a Georgia resident testing his recently passed state's "right to carry" law....

https://www.yahoo.com/travel/is-it-ok-to-bring-a-loaded-gun-into-an-airport-120692240587.html

Model2128Ga

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 6
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 6
Originally Posted By: Model2128Ga
Here is a Georgia resident testing his recently passed state's "right to carry" law....

https://www.yahoo.com/travel/is-it-ok-to-bring-a-loaded-gun-into-an-airport-120692240587.html

Model2128Ga


And here is some interesting reporting on that event and the issues raised by open carry:
CSM

Last edited by Doverham; 06/09/15 11:16 AM.

Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
If you don't think the UN is actively working to eliminate our 2nd Amendment rights just read this attached article as it's probably an eye opener for many here.
Jim

Wednesday, 22 July 2015
UN Calls for RFID Chips and Biometric Tracking of Guns and Ammo
Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.




UN Calls for RFID Chips and Biometric Tracking of Guns and Ammo


At a recent meeting of government representatives of nations participating in the United Nations’ Programme of Action (POA), the focus was on tracking of civilian weapons, component parts, and ammunition, and how the United States should spend more money helping foreign countries accomplish those goals.

At the Second Meeting of Governmental Experts (MGE2) held at the UN headquarters in Manhattan, the globalists discussed a couple of agenda items that should give pause to Americans.

First, the delegates at the MGE2 deliberated on how to eliminate the threat of technologically advanced weapons, including so-called polymer firearms and 3D printed guns, as well as the tracking of materials used in the “craft-production of small arms and light weapons.”

Not surprisingly, the representative from China called for increased UN-mandated regulations on 3D printers and the weapons they produce.

In the Chair’s Summary, the group united in a call for “strengthening 3D printing regulations in the context of 3D weapon printing,” for “ensuring export licenses [are] in place for 3D printers,” for drawing global attention to “the need to pay attention to the resale of such printers,” and for “strengthening controls over 3D printing technology.”

No one is shocked, of course, that the globalists at the UN want to draw up comprehensive plans to take guns — any and every variety of gun — out of the hands of civilians.



After discussing similar strategies to lock down the manufacture, purchase, sale, and transfer of polymer weapons and modular weapons, the next item on the MGE2 attendees’ agenda warrants an immediate withdrawal of the United States from the world body.

Paragraph 33 of the Chair’s Summary of the meeting calls for urgent tracking of civilian-owned firearms, recommending that manufacturers be forced by the UN to install “RFID and biometric technologies in limiting the access to the weapon to authorized users only,” with authorized users defined as state actors (UN member nations).

That’s right. As part of the Programme of Action (the foundation upon which the Arms Trade Treaty is built), the United States has committed to passing legislation that will require domestic firearms and ammunition manufacturers to equip their products with RFID chips and biometric technologies that will help the government slowly but surely disarm civilians.

That’s not all. At the end of that paragraph, the UN suggests states (member countries) look into combining RFID chips, biometrics, with GPS tracking technologies to be sure to prevent regular people from getting their hands on guns.

Next, in the overview of the published summary of the conference, the UN looks to one source to help pay for the implementation of these new disarmament policies: increased foreign aid.

Specifically, the unelected, unaccountable UN globocrats call for greater “international cooperation and assistance” (read: American taxpayer dollars) to offset the massive cost of the “transfer of technology and knowledge” necessary to make the proposed gun grab a reality.

It should be noted that Paragraph 42 of the summary proposes funding this fascism “through the UN regular budget,” 22 percent of which is paid by the United States, through a process that can be described as nothing less than legalized theft of the wealth of the American worker.

As if the point was already made, the document calls for the cultivating of a “culture of peace,” which is certainly shorthand for flooding the United States with UN-created propaganda linking the civilian ownership of firearms with homicide and other violent crimes.

In the wake of the horrific Chattanooga murders, it doesn’t take too much foresight to predict a panoply of renewed calls for controlling and regulating civilian access to firearms.

Finally, according to the text of the latest draft of the agreement, the POA will serve as an “international instrument to enable states to identify and trace, in a timely and reliable manner,” the small arms and light weapons that are the subject of the scheme.

In practice, this means that the governments of member nations (including the United States) will soon create a massive, all-inclusive database of all parties that manufacture, own, sell, trade, or transfer arms and ammunition.

If recent history is a reliable indicator of how such data would be used, after the catalog is complete, Congress could pass a law (or the president could issue an executive order) compelling “voluntary” surrender of privately-owned weapons, ammo, parts, and components (including reloading equipment). If, after a statutorily-set window, citizens don’t turn in these items to their local law enforcement, then officers will be sent to remind violators of their responsibility under the law to disarm.

Paragraph 32 of the Chair’s Summary lays out the plan for “real-time tracking” of firearms and ammunition “from manufacturer to storage and from storage up to the individual users.”

Once the governments of the member nations begin tracking and confiscating weapons from civilians, the Programme of Action (paragraphs 30 and 31) mandates that member governments take “direct control over transfers of small arms and light weapons.”

This control will require the federal government to begin stockpiling these items and making a database of the recently impounded guns, bullets, 3D printers, plastics, polymers, and component parts.

This database must include "the marking, record-keeping and tracing of weapons, and in this regard considered barcodes, radio frequency identification (RFID) and biometrics for purposes of electronically identifying stored items, collecting data on them and enabling the data to be entered automatically into record-keeping systems."

It is evident from a reading of this latest UN disarmament publication that despite the rhetoric related to ”promotion of a culture of peace,” there are only two reasons the UN is making every effort to disarm the population of the United States: to weaken our sovereignty, and to take from our people their ability to resist those despots (at home and abroad) who would place us under the boot of tyranny and demote us to the ranks of slaves on a “sustainable” global plantation.

The next round of meetings for hammering out the details of the Programme of Action is scheduled for 2016. That gives Americans almost one year to convince their representatives in Congress to pass legislation defunding the UN and forcing the world-government-in-waiting to relocate to a more hospitable home.


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Why we have to remain ever vigilant!
Jim

http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservativ...l-gun-platform/


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
And the Lunacy in New York State Continues:
Jim

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/29/dis...om-owning-guns/


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
This is a leaked tape on H Clinton's private bashing of the NRA, the 2nd Amendment and the Supreme Court in regards to our 2nd Amendment rights. She leave little doubt of her agenda should she ever occupy the White House again. The attack was NEVER intended to become public knowledge.
Jim

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/10/...o-go-after-nra/


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
The hypocrisy of the Obama Administration has reached a new low!
Jim


http://www.independentsentinel.com/pass-more-gun-laws-even-though-we-dont-enforce-the-ones-we-have/

So I guess what we really need to do is repeal all 20,000 of them and start over! crazy smirk


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Page 29 of 37 1 2 27 28 29 30 31 36 37

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.073s Queries: 36 (0.051s) Memory: 0.8822 MB (Peak: 1.8987 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 11:24:04 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS