doublegunshop.com - home Forums Republican's Incompetence Caucus

Not ALL Democrats are anti-gun King. Nor are all Liberals anti-gun. But with rhetoric like you post here on a fairly regular basis, there can be no doubt that you are anti 2nd Amendment and anti-NRA.




Then there's this little gem where King attempts to link our Constitutional RKBA to an insane allegation that we "accept" mass murder and mass school shootings:



When I posted this anti-gun rhetoric in another thread, King's immediate response was, "Evidence please."

Only King could be caught with the smoking gun in his hand and proclaim innocence. The whole exchange can be read in the "300,000,000, Yes 300,000,000" thread beginning with King's post #421751. Pathetically sick.

You are clearly not on the side of gun rights King Brown. You are no help to us whatsoever. You are here to undermine us and LULL others into complacency.

Good thoughts CZ. The only difference I think is the nominee needs to be a great, not good, candidate. Also, 'good' message, I hope means a 'resonating' message, not necessarily some farce about taking 'the high road'.

By 'weird litmus tests', I take it to mean gun right issues. Chances are the topic would come up on a double gun forum, but social and foreign policy issues the are divisive seem to follow the exact same party lines. But, regardless of who they might vote for, I'm usually not too tickled about folks who say they're above it all, so they won't vote.

Trump has good/great crossover appeal because he has a simple, if outrageous, plan on immigration that a working man can understand.

He says, " I will stop..."
Can't get clearer than that.
It translates to pocket book issues for the working people in the middle. They know their earnings, and standards of living, are diminished by unfettered immigration.

It is very likely the single most uniting element of current presidential politics. Your party doesn't matter if you feel undermined by illegal immigration. Real or imagined.

Dealing with urbanization and the second amendment is a far more difficult task than getting elected on pocketbook issues.

We don't have "illegal immigration". We have an "illegal invasion". 25% of the population of Mexico has moved, here, in the last 40 years. The very great majority of those people were not invited. What other country on the face of the planet could/would have let that happen to themselves?
Real or imagined does not enter the picture. We have 20 million uninvited foreign people, the great majority of them uneducated, and unable to speak, read, or write English, who place a huge burden on American society, in the form of entitlements, welfare and emergency services. They are involved in the justice system at rates 15-20 times that of US citizens.
They are not our neighbors, our friends, or our brothers. They are a scourge.
It needs to end, and they need to go.
I'm tired of talk of building a fence. Plant a minefield. I'll help.


Best,
Ted

I for one don't believe our constitution allows gays the right to bear arms.

Then you and your wife lil k should disarm immediately.

I think you're right CZ, and the most interesting aspect for me is how this plays on election day. A strong majority is alienated and seriously conflicted by illegals, a natural human sentiment in these circumstances, but the US has a strong ethos of compassion, to do the right thing. Eighty-two per cent of Canada favoured the governing party's anti-Islam position on immigration and refugees leading into our Oct. 19 federal election. They voted out the party.

Caitlyn SKB you should get in the Guinness World Records book as the first gAy gun'smurf

jOe, just STFU if you can't add anything.

At least when you are talking about guns, you sometimes are right and can add to the conversation. Down here in misfires you simply spew shit.