doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Down one

If it's OK to constantly refer to socially liberal people as "LibTards", is it also appropriate to call socially conservative Republicans "ReTards"?

And the issue is constantly .
I doubt the socially conservative board members would consider that insulting turn-a-bout fair and welcome play.

Drew doesn't like demeaning attributions on this forum, and I happen to agree with him.

King Brown, we can all see why you'd think my illuminating your anti-2nd Amendment rhetoric would be nasty, but those anti-gun quotes happen to be your own words.

Drew took the time to initiate this thread to specifically single out Jim, Dave K. and myself. Jim and I have responded, and I have little doubt that Dave would do the same if he happened to see it. My own open and accurate response is none of your business. Your input is merely more of your own protracted attempt to denigrate those who point out that you are no friend to U.S. gun owners. Drew's thread has absolutely nothing to do with a community of interest in double guns. It represents his dissatisfaction with things that are said about the Liberal Left such as yourself, who are continually undermining our gun rights. I don't know his motivation for defending FUDDs and Libtards like you King. Nor do I care.

We certainly do have a fringe element here. There are a handful of people similar to you who claim to be pro-gun, but frequently post anti-gun, anti-2nd Amendment, and anti-NRA bullshit. Some, like you, openly voice support for extreme anti-gun politicians. Others, like Dr. Wanker and your little brother Larry, are too ashamed to reveal their support for anti-gun politicians, but think they're fooling us by only tearing down the pro-gun candidate.

Welcoming you into the big tent of gun owners is about as smart as welcoming termites into a wooden house.

ClapperZapper's post is a shining example of what I'm saying. He does consider Republicans and Conservatives to be retards. He had a long history of derisive comments about them in the old Misfires forum. He sparred regularly with conservatives over his own open support of anti-gun politicians. All that's missing here is more commentary from the usual suspects.

If ClapperZapper thinks it is OK for Drew to initiate off-topic threads to launch personal attacks against me, Jim, or Dave... then I have to assume he would have no problem if we initiate threads that launch personal attacks against people like him and King Brown.

This should be fun.

Same here. I wish Dave would just dump these clowns and let this once great forum get back to double-gun talk.

Keith, I look at it with a much narrower view than you do.

I see no need to CONSTANTLY refer to a different sect of board member as a "Lib Tard", or a "ReTard" for that matter, and I won't.

It doesn't add anything positive to the discussion of doubleguns at all.

Here you go Dave... to refresh your faulty memory of this once great forum. First up is a link to people confronting King back in 2007 about his assertions that the 2nd Amendment does not confer and Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms:

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=38521&page=1

Then there's this 2008 link to one of the many threads launching a personal attack entitled "Beware of James Legg. Danger"

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=107486&page=4

And here's a link to a thread started by Jim that quotes Dave Weber posting his absolute disgust with the "commie libtards" that run the state of New York.

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showthreaded&Number=336417

EDIT: Clapper, I don't constantly refer to King Brown as a Libtard. I usually go with the more narrow and well defined term, ANTI-GUN TROLL. My opinion of him is based upon his own anti-gun rhetoric. He is no better than termites in a wooden house. No friend to U.S. gun owners, and I can only imagine how his fellow Canadians would feel if he posted similar crap on the Canadian Gun Nutz forum. They'd probably beat him like a baby seal.

So the answer is to keep up with the name calling and offensive labels?

So your answer is to welcome cancer cells into your lung because a cancer cell is a cell and an anti-2nd Amendment gun owner is a gun owner, and we should welcome all into one big happy tent? Don't be ridiculous.

Keith, your chemo regimen is killing the patient. What's the point if the people you most want to influence stay away from this place? Ridiculous? Who?

I will look forward to your return


Michael Dittamo, Topeka KS