|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 members (AGS, Sandlapper, WJW),
930
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,467
Posts545,121
Members14,409
| |
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
I've pointed out your own personal attacks which you have made here many times King. Strangely, people like Drew haven't, but what the hell, eh? But I can understand why you choose to ignore the FACT that you have frequently referred to Conservatives as racists, misogynists, haters, greedy, selfish, filthy, etc., and most recently... "the Fringe" or "IT". I also know you wished to totally excuse nca225 for what he posted here about my daughters. If Jim, Dave, or I, or any other Conservative here had said something similar about your daughters, you'd have lost your mind. And I wouldn't have blamed you for doing so. I sure as hell wouldn't suggest that you should forgive such behavior, as you did. Yet you call me "the Fringe" and give a pass for far more egregious behavior from anti-2nd Amendment Liberals like you. Interesting. Dishonesty (or hypocrisy) is not civility King. Thanks once again for keeping this thread alive to shine a light on how frauds like you roll, troll. Ed, historically the individual "right" to bear arms is relatively new. I believe John Ashcroft in 2002 became the first federal attorney-general to proclaim that individuals should be able to own guns. The Supreme Court in 2008 overturned all mainstream legal and historical scholarship by ruling that there is an individual right to own firearms although with some limits. Obama said it again last week.
I believe that during the previous 218 years the Second meant what it said: firearms shall be held by "the People"---a collective and not individual right---insofar they are in the service of "a well-regulated militia." Was an individual right even mentioned at the Constitutional Convention or in the House when it ratified the Amendment or when debated in state legislatures? I don't think so.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
I sometimes pass car wrecks. My mind says 'Don't Look!'. My head and eyes do not always comply. Weakness probably...Geo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,485 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,485 Likes: 391 |
James, is it so easy? Littering in public places isn't acceptable but okay if you choose not to see it? The poison Franc and others object to pokes into more than this post. You and I, with the majority here, have different opinions but don't get into personal attacks as The Fringe does. King, I understand your point but I think it's wrong-headed. This is not a public place. It is a private place where one can be selective about what one chooses to expose oneself to. I get a newbie stumbling into a spot he's rather not be, but not most of the 200 most active members here. We all know what's what. And much as I admire and respect Rev Doc Drew for both his contribution to relieve mankind's suffering and increasing our knowledge of Damascus, I believe in this thread he knew exactly what he was doing and knew that he was taking an oblique, no actually a rather direct, swipe at those he doesn't care for. He was aiming for a parting shot in the first post. So predictable stuff happens. And I'm completely fine with people expressing their opinion. So I have no problem whatsoever with Rev Doc Drew's OP. It's the others complaining about being forced to be exposed to this I have little time for. No one is forced to read it. You could see it coming a mile away. Don't like it. Don't read it. But as Keith regularly points out, with 5000 some odd views, this kind of thread seems to attract people.
Last edited by canvasback; 10/02/16 12:35 PM. Reason: grammar
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
At least I can rest easy knowing that you have me on IGNORE Geo, and never see my posts? Right?
Don't answer that or folks will know that you're peeking again!
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
I sometimes pass car wrecks. My mind says 'Don't Look!'. My head and eyes do not always comply. Weakness probably...Geo Yup...Geo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,485 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,485 Likes: 391 |
I sometimes pass car wrecks. My mind says 'Don't Look!'. My head and eyes do not always comply. Weakness probably...Geo Yup...Geo George, having given up trying to control the urge in real life, now I think I'm doing well when I pass up the click bait on-line. Human nature. 
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
Here comes a reply from the transgender coward nca225!
Edit: Looks like he/she chickened out. Either that, or his/her ghost writer called him/her and told him/her to hold off.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
James, is it so easy? Littering in public places isn't acceptable but okay if you choose not to see it? The poison Franc and others object to pokes into more than this post. You and I, with the majority here, have different opinions but don't get into personal attacks as The Fringe does. King, I understand your point but I think it's wrong-headed. This is not a public place. It is a private place where one can be selective about what one chooses to expose oneself to. I get a newbie stumbling into a spot he's rather not be, but not most of the 200 most active members here. We all know what's what. And much as I admire and respect Rev Doc Drew for both his contribution to relieve mankind's suffering and increasing our knowledge of Damascus, I believe in this thread he knew exactly what he was doing and knew that he was taking an oblique, no actually a rather direct, swipe at those he doesn't care for. He was aiming for a parting shot in the first post. So predictable stuff happens. And I'm completely fine with people expressing their opinion. So I have no problem whatsoever with Rev Doc Drew's OP. It's the others complaining about being forced to be exposed to this I have little time for. No one is forced to read it. You could see it coming a mile away. Don't like it. Don't read it. But as Keith regularly points out, with 5000 some odd views, this kind of thread seems to attract people. CB: I just wanted to add that I agree with your assessment of Hause's motives in kicking off this string of vitriol. That's fine if that's the way he feels about me and others here. But it also clearly shows the type of individual he is by starting a thread disparaging forum members and then leaving for a considerable amount of time. I guess he's a true believer in H. Truman's statement that: "If you can't stand the heat get the Hell out of the kitchen". The sad thing to me is he now has created animosity between members where I don't think there was in the past. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8 |
If Jim, Dave, or I, or any other Conservative here had said something similar about your daughters, you'd have lost your mind... This is about as dishonest as you can get princess as you are forgetting to mention some very important facts. You don't get my abuse for no reason princess. Lest you conveniently forget you posted a picture of my dog from my photobucket account, suggesting I gave it an STD. You were then informed who I got that STD from and you haven't get over it since. So in your scenario, lets add that fact. Good 'ol King would have gone into your personal online photo album, posted a pic of your pet and then suggest that you gave your pet an STD. No one in the world would believe King would lower himself to do that and you know that as well. Your whole scenario is based on a lie done by omission.
Last edited by nca225; 10/02/16 01:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8 |
Hold on...Wait for it...wait for it...princess is gonna cry again. Whaaaaa! Whaaaaaaa! WHAAAAAAA!!!!!! You said something mean to me.... sniffle sniffle.
Last edited by nca225; 10/02/16 01:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
