doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Trump 2016 Wahooo! It's a lock.

Here's a link to an interesting Blog page that illustrates how and why Trump got elected. This is from 2010. The pressure cooker which was simmering has finally and predictably exploded. It's not surprising that King Brown, the Muse of Nova Scotia, couldn't see it coming when his mind simply chooses to totally shut out anything that doesn't fit his insane world view, which incidentally includes blind allegiance to anti-2nd Amendment Democrat politicians:

https://thefreedomimages.wordpress.com/

And here's an example of what I was referring to in my last post. And Libtards wonder why responsible Americans want nothing to do with them. I guess their behavior was set at the top with multiple reports regarding Clinton being very drunk and abusive on election night and having to be physically restrained when it was apparent she would lose.
Jim

http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/electoral-college-voters-deluged-with-death-threats/

Where's the evidence of what you say, Ken? A minority racially split vote eviscerated Washington as a pox on all its houses for not representing its interests so it could start all over again with a representative government.

Your own words negate and remove possibility of defeating any measure of tyranny by blaming one party for the widely acknowledged manipulation. The country's recorded desire before the election was to rid itself of all the rascals.

The concept of a "racially split vote" is irrelevant considering there is no such thing as "Race". What has happened, due to the Democrat control of the educational system, is the creation of a subculture. This subculture has been indoctrinated to believe it is oppressed, and therefore morally entitled to the freedom of their fellow Americans. All according to the sociopathic, subjective morality of Soviet created Black Liberation Theology. The most significant aspect of this religious belief is that it totally disregards the American concept of individual freedom and equality, and instead substitutes Soviet collectivism for its rationalization. What this does is enable the collective to avoid any intellectually objective analysis of their religious subculture, which would mean that individuals would be judged by the Content of their Character, rather than by the Color of their Skin. Since the whole point of the creation of this subculture is to bind it politically to the Democrat Party, they will always attempt to perpetuate it. Now you know why the idea of a Colorblind Society has been demonized, it doesn't serve the statist interests of the Democrats.

WHEW! Glad we got THAT cleared up...

Me, too.

Are you poking fun at the influence of feeding our kids a steady diet of progressive pc?

What's your thought on the various ways that colleges and universities across the US have 'helped' their students cope with the Trump election victory? I'd particularly like to know how using 'educational' funds, often from state tax payers, can be justified expenses for; playdough, coloring books, legos, comfort puppies, miniature ponies and of course cry rooms?

These kids were ten or twelve years old when bo took office. Immediately, inserts were printed up that fall for sticking in publicly funded text books, and by that January, history was rewritten with text books all about pc on steroids.

Again, specifically, what would make anyone think these kids need comfort animals, infantile toys and cry rooms? What would make kids in higher education seek out and actually use these types of entitlements?

Is this 'our' future?

All in the past, craig. The US now has a party of the people to end the tyranny, if not the first day or the first month it's beginning of the end of all that pc, worries about guns and the Second, getting that 35 per cent tax cut and spending on the wastrels. Rejoice. Anyone beating on the bad days is a troll!

We should start a list of things trump said he would do and did not.....AND a list of things he said he would do, and did?

I'll start

Said he would do, but did not do:
1) charge hillary and put her in jail- NOPE. He just announced he will not. not even an investigation.
2) The 'wall' will be a fence, he admits. hope he starts that one at least.
3)?


Things he said he would do, and did:
1) said he will tweet....and does.
2)


IN THIS WAY WE CAN ALL SEE HOW GOOD, OR BAD, HIS PRESIDENCY IS GOING. PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING.

Not a bad idea. But, we need a "Control" to be set initially. Why don't we analyze Obama first? Let's list all his campaign issues, then compare them to what he actually did. This would be "fair". Dal, why don't you start things off.