|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,495
Posts545,348
Members14,410
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,343 Likes: 390 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ? For a minute there, I thought King Brown had returned with his thoughts.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ? 
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394 |
jOe's suggestion (and the NRA's position) is actually pretty reasonable.
Until you consider that it's just a way-station on the way to a total removal of guns from private hands. No accommodation is enough. If it were, I'd be all for it. But those people will never give up until all guns are in the hands of the government. Not a happy thought.
Last edited by canvasback; 10/06/17 10:16 AM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
I don't know what the problem is, the ATF granted these stocks under Obama because of the disability guidelines in the regulation, so they can simply reverse their decision on that regulation, interpretation of the regulation and NOT interpretation of the law, and say no.
No new law is required.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 308
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 308 |
RIGIDITY is not always a virtue...
I support banning bump-stocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,463 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,463 Likes: 207 |
The NRA didn't say they agree with banning bump stocks, they agreed to discuss it.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9 |
I don't know what the problem is, the ATF granted these stocks under Obama because of the disability guidelines in the regulation, so they can simply reverse their decision on that regulation, interpretation of the regulation and NOT interpretation of the law, and say no.
No new law is required. Yep.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
I mean I was always getting yelled at by our lawyers, "That's the regulation not the law."
Right????
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,588 Likes: 9 |
I support banning bump-stocks.
Why? What do gunowners gain from such a ban?
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
