doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Red Flag Laws thread Locked?

....nca225 is still unable to produce a shred of evidence that Trump engaged in collusion with Russia to throw the election. He/she cannot admit to Obama's interference in the Israeli election process. And Nancy-boy won't go near the huge exchange of cash for influence between Russia and the Clintons.

Libtards like nca225 fail to defend our Republic (not democracy) every time they support the Liberal Left Democrat anti-gunners who work to subvert our Constitution and infringe upon the 2nd Amendment.

Nancy boy places hope in the Courts. Yet he/she votes for Liberal Left Democrats who would stack the Courts with Judges who ignore the Original Intent of the Framers. King also likes the idea of the Constitution as a so-called "Living Document" which can be changed at the whims of activist judges who bypass Congress and legislate from the bench.

King's little brother Larry Clown is concerned that craigd may not know of the process for amending the constitution. But he never chimes in to confront Libtards like King and nca225 who work to bypass that whole process.

As Ted astutely points out, Nancy-boy nca225 is still unable to produce a shred of evidence that Trump engaged in collusion with Russia to throw the election. He/she cannot admit to Obama's interference in the Israeli election process. And Nancy-boy won't go near the huge exchange of cash for influence between Russia and the Clintons.

Jim, the old German gunsmith who lived a couple miles from my Dad once showed me some vierlings and drillings that were engraved and inlaid like this. I used to frequent his gun shop and was looking at the used gun rack one day, and he came over and said in broken English, "These guns... all junk! You want see some nice guns, I show you nice guns." He took me into his house which was attached to the shop, and it was stuffed with guns of all kinds. Many were extremely ornate, heavily engraved, and inlaid with gold, silver, and ivory.

He explained to me that he was trained as an armorer for the German Army during WWII, and that part of his his job was to destroy guns that the Nazi's confiscated from towns and villages they conquered during the Blitzkrieg. They would issue a decree to the residents that they had 24 hours to turn in their guns, and if they were caught with guns after that, they were executed.

He told me he was supposed to remove the stocks from the guns, burn the wood, and put the breech section of the barreled action in a press, and crush it so it could not be recaptured and reused. The scrap was sent to steel mills to be converted to new steel for Nazi weapons. He said, "Oh, I crush a lot of very nice guns, but really nice ones, I keep and stash when I can. Then after the war, I come to United States, and my brother smuggle them over here to me." I have no idea how they accomplished this, but he didn't just have a lot of guns. He literally had tonnage. Not all of it was as nice as your photo, but I saw stuff that rivaled anything I saw in the NRA Museum, Harold's Club Casino gun collection in Reno, or anything else I've seen.

The last time I saw these guns was in 1991 during the first Gulf War. I went to his new house he built after he retired to see if he had some Mauser parts I needed. His wife remembered me and invited me in because he wasn't feeling well. The new house was also stuffed with guns... thousands of them, in every room. Many were getting that dry rust patina that comes from neglect. It would have taken a year just to clean them all. He and his wife were cheering for Saddam Hussein as CNN reported that Iraq was firing Scud missiles into Israel. They called them "Stud Missiles" in their broken English, and saying they hoped Saddam killed all of the Jews. Once a Nazi, always a Nazi, I guess.

Bro. King: I came of age in the 60s, but believe our nation is much more and likely irreversibly fractured, and our union may soon be severed. How can we �just get along� when the traditional/conservative/deplorable vs. the progressive/enlightened/liberal positions are:
1. The Constitution means what it says and says what it means. It does not mean what a progressive chooses it to mean today, to be changed tomorrow.
2. The purpose of government is the common good; to serve the people, transparently, and not the other way around; to provide public works and for the defense of our nation. To encourage free enterprise and creativity.
3. Our rights are given by our Creator, and with rights come responsibilities. Our rights are not awarded by the government, which does not exist to give me my desires, wants and perceived needs.
4. The brilliance of our Founding Fathers is in creating a Constitution in which the government is protected from a state church, and the churches are protected from the government. And the minority is protected from the tyranny of the majority. In NO way did the Founding Fathers assert that the church was to have no influence (for good) or voice in government. And they would be shocked that preaching the Bible is now �hate speech� as it is in Europe.
5. Our rights are insured/enforced by the Rule of Law; not the rule of power or wealth (see 3rd world governments below).
6. The 2nd Amendment allows the people to provide for their personal safety (rather than hoping the government will do so), and to prevent the government from denying our God given rights. And many places in our nation have 3rd world levels of violence, which is metastasizing.
7. Killing babies in the womb is as wrong as killing babies after birth.
8. Our nation is exceptional, but with a dark history that must be factually stated, with the appropriate historical context. That does not however justify reparations for every possible victim groups, paid by those who had no responsibility for the harm.
9. Indoctrinating grade schoolers to gender fluidity, and requiring that they celebrate a classmate�s �transition� is wrong.
10. A nation without borders is not a nation, nor secure. And we don't improve 3rd world nations by bringing the nations here. We DO have some (Biblical?) obligation to help the suffering people in 3rd world nations (primarily because of the corruption of the governments) however.

Gun rights are not one issue; the above all go together in the minds of most of us.

So maybe we split into a. the NE; b. the south, mid-west, mountain west and southwest, and c. the left coast? Maybe give New Mexico back to Mexico? And let the great migration begin. Really.

I suppose you�re trying to impress on me how difficult it would be to amend the Constitution? Maybe, you could address your thought to King, to put his popular vote claim into perspective?

Drew. Rights are not given to us by the Creator. There is none. Rights are secured through force and will.

If it were true that rights are secured through a creator, where the hell was he during most of recorded history where the track record is oppression by those in power? God didn't give use any level of freedom. We took it by force, and to say god gave it to us ignores the sacrifices of those who actually fought to secure it.

Case in point:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/0...lYBN/story.html

Where is the creator and his endowed rights for these kids?