doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com 9/11

This from full-bore patriot keith today on the 400th anniversary of slavery:

"Civil Rights would never have happened in this country if enough people did not support politicians who passed Civil Rights legislation. Same goes for Women's suffrage, i.e., the right of women to vote."

There's something to be proud. Salute to you, keith!

earliest reference to slavery i recall was many more centuries ago in egypt...pharaoh, let my people go...as in, "go down moses, way down in egypt's land...tell ol phaaa roe, let mah people go"...

Larry, I'm highly confident that you can come up with tons of examples of who knows what, but will you consider answering one question. How can I get one of those ignorance of the law free passes?

It's a fun exercise, what if I were king, not Brown, for a day. I'd probably get a little miffed if I thought investigators under me were blowing smoke up my... Quick question, is one joint still illegal or not? If it is, maybe I'd set up the equivalent meter maids and fund the whole department twenty-five bucks at a time by issuing a truckload of citations?

You're wrong that I'd ignore big fish or squander resources. I'd approach it from the philosophy that the poor little druggie is responsible for huge drains on our employers for lost time, our medical system for all manors of long term chronic disease treatment, and our sensibilities for the inability to make meaningful excuses. It would be my version of making 'em pay their fair share.

What would you do if you were head of a big intel agency? Please don't say you'd bury yourself in strategy and pr meetings.

I should have said US slavery, Ed, the free labour that built the country.

The United States was founded in 1776. The 13th Amendment was passed in 1865. Your constant anti-American propaganda is tiresome and monotonous. Perhaps you�d like to enlighten us on the history of slavery in Canada, where it was practiced for many years by your indigenous peoples, among others. But I don�t suppose you�d read about that in the NYT.

You really should try reading something else once in awhile Mr Brown. You might broaden your mind a bit.

Too bad you felt the need to edit out the part about how Democrats voted against women's suffrage and Civil Rights King.

But telling the truth for once would interfere with your agenda here, i.e., defending and supporting Liberal Left anti-gun Democrats.

Why do you have such a difficult time telling the truth King?

And why are you afraid to answer my questions about your pal SKB Stevie's continuous use of this forum for free advertising of his businesses?

Craig, how many times do I have to explain to you that it's NOT AN IGNORANCE OF THE LAW ISSUE? Charities lie to people all the time about how they spend their money. And you probably can't check the Palestinian Widows and Orphans Fund via Charity Navigator. (Did you know that you can't check the Clinton Foundation via Charity Navigator?)

You can shut down speeding in a hurry by putting a whole bunch of cops on the road and giving them awards for the ones who write the most tickets. The question is: Is it a good allocation of resources? How big do you want government to be? Same story chasing little fish who send money to support terrorism while thinking they're supporting widows and orphans. You catch the big fish, try "walking back the cat" on everyone who sent him money . . . but how many FBI counterterrorism agents would it take to make solid cases? And that's what the FBI is all about. They want proof that will stand up in court. And all you've got is proof that the little fish wrote a check to a charity. You don't have proof that the little fish knew the charity was a scam, covering up where the money was really going. HUGE waste of resources.

If I were running the FBI, here's the kind of little fish I'd be looking for: One who's admitted that she wants to shoot a whole bunch of people: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/teenage...k-47/ar-AAHr5fc She's a little fish who wants to become a big fish. Not an Islamist terrorist, but someone who's about to do what Bin Laden told Muslims was their duty: kill Americans. And that's the point you keep dodging. And by the way . . . "strategy" is very important. You only have X amount of resources (unless you've decided that you're a fan of much bigger govt than what we already have). And if I'm telling my counterterrorist people to focus on stopping attacks like Orlando before they happen, I'm thinking I've hit on the correct strategy.

You created a ridiculous scenario about making me boss of something or another, and I accepted it as fun. But, my citations idea seems to have hit on the correct strategy.

There are many examples of policy creating obscene numbers of little fish. Take the southern border, doesn't that prove that a revolving door processing policy has indeed come out of the endless strategy meetings? Based on those who use electronic payments, why not just send them all a computer generated letter saying they are subject to being investigated in a case related to big fish, so and so?

I can understand your speeding example, though. I had wondered why the entire nation had stopped issuing speeding tickets, such a waste of resources. Now that every big fish US car maker and importer has been shut down, has a vacuum been created for new big fish to swoop in? Speaking of quotas, are investigation and prosecution decisions made for safety or use or lose it or tic marks? Whoa Larry, I'm kidding, just wondering why policy never ever changes with the agendas of different admins.

Your last sentence, craig. Money. Money has no conscience.

Your post I responded to last night King... your dishonest editing job in order to create more of your FAKE NEWS demonstrates to us that you also have no conscience.

Why don't you want to admit that your precious Democrats in Congress voted against both Civil Rights and women's rights to vote?

I'd guess it's the same reason that you don't wish to acknowledge that your Liberal Left Democrats are behind virtually all efforts to weaken or eliminate our Gun Rights. Much of your life is devoted to supporting anti-gunners!

But if you ever admitted to that, then you'd be admitting to your very apparent Leftist Socialist agenda to undermine our 2nd Amendment and to denigrate our NRA.