March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
4 members (Argo44, Little Creek, SKB, 1 invisible), 773 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,374
Posts544,010
Members14,391
Most Online1,131
Jan 21st, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 13 14
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
The first step, anywhere, is dividing owners into groups. Then, chiseling away at individual groups, one at a time. When you are thinking to yourself, I dont use an AR to hunt with anyway you are already firmly in the grasp of the jaws of the trap.
They want whatever you are using to hunt with, the attempt to get someones AR is just a step on the way to that.

There are many who post right here who are too stupid to connect the dots.

Best,
Ted


This is so fundamentally obvious it is stunning anyone doesn't get it. Just look at the historical actions that have taken place and are taking place in other countries.....Canada for example. There is no accommodation that can be made that isn't on the road to confiscation.

First comes licensing, then comes registration and that is followed by confiscation. They may attempt to do it inside of two years or they may take 50 years to try it do it. But that's what's happening.

The remarkable thing is that the same people who think only the government should have guns are the first to complain about LEO's overstepping their mandate.


Splitting people into groups to divide them...Kinda like right from this playbook huh?

Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: keith
Now here's a question for you ed.. And rocky mtn bill, and our other libtards:

What do you think would save the most lives and have the greatest effect on reducing violent crime???

A) Passing a law which would stop old guys like you from owning AR-15's

B) Passing laws which allow cops to stop and frisk gang-bangers and young black and Hispanic males between ages 16 and 40.

We already know that Stop and Frisk would have a greater benefit on violent crime reduction. It was proven to work in New York City and other places. But the same Liberals who want stricter gun laws that affect law abiding citizens scream bloody murder about violating the Constitutional rights of minorities by enacting Stop and Frisk.

It really isn't about saving lives then. It's about taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights and our guns.


Up here in Toronto they call it carding. After the black community with their liberal white enablers demonized it as racist, the Metro Toronto Police vowed to stop doing it. Since they stopped, gang violence and shootings have skyrocketed. So predictable. So dumb. So woke.


Forum: a medium of discussion/expression of ideas. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forum
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,444
Likes: 204
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,444
Likes: 204
Yes....Its my understanding that New Zealand has some world class trout fishing.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
The first step, anywhere, is dividing owners into groups. Then, chiseling away at individual groups, one at a time. When you are thinking to yourself, I dont use an AR to hunt with anyway you are already firmly in the grasp of the jaws of the trap.
They want whatever you are using to hunt with, the attempt to get someones AR is just a step on the way to that.

There are many who post right here who are too stupid to connect the dots.

Best,
Ted


This is so fundamentally obvious it is stunning anyone doesn't get it. Just look at the historical actions that have taken place and are taking place in other countries.....Canada for example. There is no accommodation that can be made that isn't on the road to confiscation.

First comes licensing, then comes registration and that is followed by confiscation. They may attempt to do it inside of two years or they may take 50 years to try it do it. But that's what's happening.

The remarkable thing is that the same people who think only the government should have guns are the first to complain about LEO's overstepping their mandate.


Splitting people into groups to divide them...Kinda like right from this playbook huh?

Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: keith
Now here's a question for you ed.. And rocky mtn bill, and our other libtards:

What do you think would save the most lives and have the greatest effect on reducing violent crime???

A) Passing a law which would stop old guys like you from owning AR-15's

B) Passing laws which allow cops to stop and frisk gang-bangers and young black and Hispanic males between ages 16 and 40.

We already know that Stop and Frisk would have a greater benefit on violent crime reduction. It was proven to work in New York City and other places. But the same Liberals who want stricter gun laws that affect law abiding citizens scream bloody murder about violating the Constitutional rights of minorities by enacting Stop and Frisk.

It really isn't about saving lives then. It's about taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights and our guns.


Up here in Toronto they call it carding. After the black community with their liberal white enablers demonized it as racist, the Metro Toronto Police vowed to stop doing it. Since they stopped, gang violence and shootings have skyrocketed. So predictable. So dumb. So woke.


Yeah sure. That's it. Directly comparable. Law abiding legal gun owners and gang members.

Good try nca.


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
Well CB, it still is dividing people into groups. And what was the criteria for being labeled a gang member? Membership card or color of their skin?

Not trying to be a pain, just pointing out that dividing people into groups doesn't seem to be only in the purview of the opposition.

And how does 2nd amendment purity testing prevent splitting gun owners into groups?


Forum: a medium of discussion/expression of ideas. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forum
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
This is so obvious.

One group is law abiding and acting in a legal manner having complied with the rules.

The other group, by their behavior and appearance, aligns themselves with gangs. They exhibit suspicious behavior....the equivalent to a drunk driver weaving down the road. Why shouldn't they be checked out?

Despite the bad rap the word has received.....there is some value in certain "prejudices". From the concept of "pre judging". Looks like a fish, smells like a fish. Good chance it is a fish.

Last edited by canvasback; 01/10/20 05:38 PM.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 8
I think what is obvious is that splitting people into groups is human nature, right or wrong. Can't really chalk it up to just a strategy from the opposition if its human nature and something we all engage in. And please don't mistake me, I wasn't trying to call you out on something, other than a pot calling the kettle black.


Forum: a medium of discussion/expression of ideas. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forum
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,711
Likes: 730
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,711
Likes: 730
I think it is obvious that splitting people into groups to deny them God given rights is fundamentally wrong. You dont want to exercise the right, that is your business. But, you, like it or not, should have nothing to say or do about mine.


Best,
Ted

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 386
Nca, there is no pot and kettle here. Just a dope trying to score points by making a logical leap that doesnt work. Sorry buddy. Better luck next time.

Last edited by canvasback; 01/11/20 12:20 AM.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
JDH Offline
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
I don't know much about politics or policies in New Zealand, but,I know Virginia is what you get when you elect Democrats.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,444
Likes: 204
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,444
Likes: 204
Originally Posted By: nca225
....And how does 2nd amendment purity testing prevent splitting gun owners into groups?

Who cares, with friends like you who needs.... The 2nd purity test ensures, a strong economy, international respect, the concept of sovereign borders, consequences for breaking the law not for using a plastic straw, not being a puppet of soros, not having to pretend to agree with aoc, not having to pretend ilhan's a US citizen.

In the dead of winter, only a 2nd purity policy maker will ensure your right to babble on like a summer's eve.

Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 13 14

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.071s Queries: 35 (0.049s) Memory: 0.8715 MB (Peak: 1.8987 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 23:57:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS