May
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
6 members (SKB, Wild Skies, Roundsworth, LeFusil, Argo44, 1 invisible), 221 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,547
Posts546,155
Members14,423
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Ive been looking for waterfowl dedicated side by side to compliment my upland gun which is a nicely balanced featherweight Elsie 12 gauge. I found a nice looking (from Internet photos) Parker VH 3 magnum built on a #2 frame, 30 barrels full and full, weighs in at 7.75 pounds. Coincidentally thats the exact weight of my Ruger Red Label Sporting Clays which I have been using in the duck blind for 25 years, I appreciate the extra swing weight, it also absorbs recoil and I dont have to carry it far from boat to shore blind.

Ive done a little research on the Parker site and have discovered that Parker did chamber magnum 12 gauges for three inch shells, actually 2 7/8 chambers, but for some reason most are on a too light 1 1/2 frame, some have been seen on #3 frames, but a #2 framed magnum 12 is rare. Have any of you seen a Parker magnum 12 on a two frame? Btw, the gun dealer who Ive known for 20 years says it is marked on the barrel lugs or frame, I cant remember which, as factory.

The only issue is the gun is marginally short for me at 13 7/8 including a 1 1/4 recoil pad. That coupled with the fact that Im down south running my retrievers in field trials, so cant see the gun in person till mid March, Id have to jump in blind so to speak. The comb dimensions sound like theyll work for me, but even with hunting clothes it might require a slip on pad to fit me in the duck blind.

Last edited by Glacierjohn; 01/11/20 07:41 AM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
The true, Parker "12-gauge 3-inch Magnum" guns are all late Remington guns. Parker Bros. would always chamber a gun for longer shells throughout their years, but back in the day, our North American ammunition companies didn't put heavier loads in the long shells (2 7/8, 3 and 3 1/4 inch) than one could have in a 2 3/4 inch shell. The long shells got more/better wadding. The progressive burning powder, high velocity, 12-gauge 3-inch shell with 1 3/8 ounce of shot hit the market in the 1924/5 time frame --





The 12-gauge 3-inch Magnum loads with 1 5/8 ounce of shot were introduced in 1935 by the Olins along with their new Winchester Model 12 Heavy Duck gun.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 519
Likes: 58
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 519
Likes: 58
I have a Parker GHE 12 ga on #2 frame with 32" barrels, weighs 8lbs 5 oz. Unfortunately the stock broke a piece off right behind the action, so it is in the shop being repaired. I was hoping to take it to the Southern and maybe sell there.


This ain't a dress rehearsal , Don't Let the Old Man IN
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
I should also mention that I would stick with 2 3/4 bismuth 1 1/4 oz loads.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 6
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 6
Researcher:
Do you know if Parker ever chambered a 3-inch 16 ga.?
I have a VHE with what appears to be a longer chamber.


Originally Posted By: Researcher
The true, Parker "12-gauge 3-inch Magnum" guns are all late Remington guns. Parker Bros. would always chamber a gun for longer shells throughout their years, but back in the day, our North American ammunition companies didn't put heavier loads in the long shells (2 7/8, 3 and 3 1/4 inch) than one could have in a 2 3/4 inch shell. The long shells got more/better wadding. The progressive burning powder, high velocity, 12-gauge 3-inch shell with 1 3/8 ounce of shot hit the market in the 1924/5 time frame --





The 12-gauge 3-inch Magnum loads with 1 5/8 ounce of shot were introduced in 1935 by the Olins along with their new Winchester Model 12 Heavy Duck gun.

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 19
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 19
What is marked on the lugs or table? What year is the gun? Serial number?

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
I haven't had access to the Parker Bros. records to search for 3-inch 16-gauges, but I suspect they exist. In that Parker Bros. by and large didn't mark the chamber length on their guns, only a letter or the original hang-tag can verify a non-standard chamber. There was a series of reports in the sporting press back in the day of A.W. DuBray making the rounds in the southeast doing his hunting using a 16-gauge with 2 7/8 inch shells.

The SAAMI meeting where it was "suggested" that our manufacturers start marking the chamber length on their guns was in 1937. None of my Remington pumps or autoloaders from the 1930s are marked with the chamber length. I don't have one from 1939 or 1940, but my 1941 Remington Sportsman is marked while my guns from 1936 and 1938 are not marked.





The late Remington Parkers were marked on the barrel lug with grade, gauge and chamber length --



Where Parker Bros. put the serial number --



Savage Arms Corp. started marking some of their Fox guns in 1938 and most all in 1939 onward --



I did search the A.H. Fox Gun Co. graded gun production records and found 8 or 9 3-inch 16-gauges and one ordered for 2 7/8 inch shells.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,145
Likes: 202
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,145
Likes: 202
John, if you're going to use only 2 3/4" shells, why are you searching for a 3" chambered gun? There are nice heavy Parkers with shorter chambers that are not as hard to find as a 3" gun. We would still like to hear more about the #2 frame gun you found.

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Originally Posted By: eightbore
John, if you're going to use only 2 3/4" shells, why are you searching for a 3" chambered gun? There are nice heavy Parkers with shorter chambers that are not as hard to find as a 3" gun. We would still like to hear more about the #2 frame gun you found.


Im not searching, I found one that looks like it would be a solid, not too heavy, waterfowl gun. I had a nice DS grade Lefever that was a bit heavy for chasing Montana pheasants all day long, but being 110 years old I worried about shooting heavy bismuth duck loads all day.

Cut to today; I now have a 6.5 pound LC Smith FW for pheasants and my eye on this magnum 3 Parker VH grade.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 6
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 6
Researcher: Thanks for the very thorough response to my question. As my VHE is a 1914 gun, it is entirely unmarked as to chamber lenth.
I understand it was a special order for pass shooting ducks, the rt barrel XF, and left F., so perhaps the longer chamber was part of a 16ga. "magnum" configuration. Also, sorry for hijack of the OP.
Originally Posted By: Researcher
I haven't had access to the Parker Bros. records to search for 3-inch 16-gauges, but I suspect they exist. In that Parker Bros. by and large didn't mark the chamber length on their guns, only a letter or the original hang-tag can verify a non-standard chamber. There was a series of reports in the sporting press back in the day of A.W. DuBray making the rounds in the southeast doing his hunting using a 16-gauge with 2 7/8 inch shells.

The SAAMI meeting where it was "suggested" that our manufacturers start marking the chamber length on their guns was in 1937. None of my Remington pumps or autoloaders from the 1930s are marked with the chamber length. I don't have one from 1939 or 1940, but my 1941 Remington Sportsman is marked while my guns from 1936 and 1938 are not marked.





The late Remington Parkers were marked on the barrel lug with grade, gauge and chamber length --



Where Parker Bros. put the serial number --



Savage Arms Corp. started marking some of their Fox guns in 1938 and most all in 1939 onward --



I did search the A.H. Fox Gun Co. graded gun production records and found 8 or 9 3-inch 16-gauges and one ordered for 2 7/8 inch shells.




Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
You guys got to quit playing fast and loose with the term "Magnum" in relation to North American shotgunnery. The first time our North American manufacturers used the term "Magnum" for a shotgun and/or shotgun shell was in 1932 with the introduction of Ithaca's NID Magnum-10 and the Western Super-X 10-gauge 3 1/2 inch Magnum shell for it.

Last edited by Researcher; 01/12/20 01:11 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 3
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 3
There was a photo in one of the earlier Parker books (Larry Baer author) showing a 20 gauge DHE built as one of two guns purchased by an east coast duck club in the Teens. It had factory 3" chambers...

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 12
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 12
Researcher, do you have a couple of rooms for your library of paper work on old shotguns and shells ? I can still remembering my mother taking me over to the county library and looking up the section for gun related books. I'd usually end up with Greeners big thick book to take home but have to bring back in 3 days. I'm always so amazed at all the info you present on the different gun web sites. Thank you very much for sharing some of what you have.

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Originally Posted By: Researcher
You guys got to quit playing fast and loose with the term "Magnum" in relation to North American shotgunnery. The first time our North American manufacturers used the term "Magnum" for a shotgun and/or shotgun shell was in 1932 with the introduction of Ithaca's NID Magnum-10 and the Western Super-X 10-gauge 3 1/2 inch Magnum shell for it.


I wish I knew how to post pictures off my iPhone. I have a picture of the barrel lugs that looks factory original. Under one barrel it clearly shows a JG in an oval and 3 in. MAG. the middle has a 12 sideways 2; the other barrel has a V in a circle, HT over A and a large 4 smaller 2.

I assume the 4-2 is the barrel weight, V = V grade, HT over A proof marks? Anyway, this looks to me like a later Parker that truly is a 3 Magnum.

Last edited by Glacierjohn; 01/13/20 04:15 PM.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,430
Likes: 315
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,430
Likes: 315
Blame it on G.E. Lewis. I don't have the date of this ad, but VL&D were the U.S. agents for G.E. Lewis in 1923.



Greener used the term in the 1907 edition of "The Gun"
https://books.google.com/books?id=3HMCAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA378&vq

Then there were all the "Long Rangers". Parker "Long Range" in the 1894-95 Montgomery Ward catalog







Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Quote:
There was a photo in one of the earlier Parker books (Larry Baer author) showing a 20 gauge DHE built as one of two guns purchased by an east coast duck club in the Teens. It had factory 3" chambers...


Close but no cigar!! The pictures on page 36 and 37 of Larry's 1980 combined book of his two previous books from 1974 and 1976, are from the famous Widgeon Duck Club near Visalia, California. There were eight guns in that order to R.F. Cross Hardware Co., seven DHEs and one BHE. The gun Larry showed was the J.A. Hannah gun. Here is the hang-tag for the gun --



The tag shows it wasn't targeted with the hottest 20-gauge loads offered at that time of 2 1/2 drams of bulk smokeless powder or 20 grains of dense smokeless powder such as Infallible or Ballistite pushing 7/8 ounce of shot, but rather the lighter 2 1/4 dram load --



I don't know what Larry was talking about when he stated they were made "with 3-inch chambers for the then revolutionary "ajax heavy" 20-gauge magnum shells." The shells he pictures with the gun are Peters IDEAL with the standard load of the day of 2 1/2 drams of E.C. pushing 7/8 ounce of shot.

Last edited by Researcher; 01/13/20 08:10 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Originally Posted By: Paul Harm
Researcher, do you have a couple of rooms for your library of paper work on old shotguns and shells ? I can still remembering my mother taking me over to the county library and looking up the section for gun related books. I'd usually end up with Greeners big thick book to take home but have to bring back in 3 days. I'm always so amazed at all the info you present on the different gun web sites. Thank you very much for sharing some of what you have.


While I do have a pretty serious collection of Western Cartridge Co. paper, a lot of ammo catalogs are available on the International Ammunition Association web site, but for as long as I've been looking at it, Winchester and U.S. Cartridge Co. are "coming soon."

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Quote:
I have a picture of the barrel lugs that looks factory original. Under one barrel it clearly shows a JG in an oval and 3 in. MAG. the middle has a 12 sideways 2; the other barrel has a V in a circle, HT over A and a large 4 smaller 2.


My best guess is that the "3 in. MAG." was stamped on the barrel flat by the gunsmith that hogged the chambers out to 3-inch.

If you want, email the picture to AHFCA@comcast.net and I'll post it. You still haven't told us the serial number of the gun.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,430
Likes: 315
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,430
Likes: 315
Same fella?


Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Thanks, Ill do that. Ill ask what the serial number is.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 110
Here is the OPs picture of the barrel flats.



It has the split extractor stems, so appears to me to be a VHE-Grade.

In that the barrel flats do not show the PARKER BROS. OVERLOAD PROVED stamping, it would indicate production before 1926.


Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Im passing on the Parker. I bought a nice Sterlingworth Pin gun off the for sale section. I cant wait to see it.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 9
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 9
My old friend Bob(long gone) loved big bore Parkers. I remember that Bob had a 3 inch 12, 2 3.5 10's and a D grade 8 with titanic barrels. The 8 was pictured in the second year of Double Gun.

bill

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,145
Likes: 202
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,145
Likes: 202
Bill, can you give us a better idea of which issue and article contains the picture of the D grade 8?

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Great day today smile

Mike

Last edited by skeettx; 01/28/20 08:26 PM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 9
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 9
Eightbore
I wrote the article and I am sorry to report I do not remember what issue.

bill

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Fun place

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 1161
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 1161
Originally Posted By: skeettx
I have been advised thusly by DAM16SXS

_______________________________________________________

"Sir, I don't know your name but you must be a PGCA Member, otherwise you would not have the Parker Pages Archive.

I, as editor of Parker Pages for the last ten years, demand you pull down your post with a link to the Parker Pages Archive immediately.

By posting it you have violated Copyright law. Every page of every issue of Parker Pages,since it began in 1993 is copyright protected and can NOT be legally copied in any shape or formwithout written consent of the Parker Gun Collectors Association -and YOU DO NOT HAVE PERMISSION TO DO WHAT YOU HAVE DONE.

I order you to pull it down immediately -you have opened yourself to a lawsuit by posting a link to copyrighted material.
"

______________________________________________________


I am NOT a PGCA member, and found this on google search
But to insure harmony I stand down smile

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Double+Gun+magazine+8+gauge+parker

Sixth article down

Mike


Well now, who owes who an apology? blush

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 13
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 13
I do... and I openly and publicly apologize to you Mr. skeettx.

I discovered later today when I opened the link and performed the ctrl F function and typed a topic or author into the box it would bring up those selected items (which is what alarmed me earlier today) but I couldn't continue in opening the articles or pages of the magazine... so my face is red.

My apologies to all involved... and my thanks to you Mike for not making this a bigger issue than I had made it.

Dean

Last edited by DAM16SXS; 01/28/20 07:30 PM.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 170
Dean,

Shucks, all is well !!

I went to the skeet range from 9AM to 11:30
and I NEVER missed a target.

BUT it was 30 degrees, snowing and wind blowing from the North
at 30 MPH

Also, NEVER pulled the trigger on a clay smile

Mike


USAF RET 1971-95 [Linked Image from jpgbox.com]
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 13
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 13
Mike - that sounds like some of our New Years Day Shoots in NH every year.

I dont blame you for not shooting... I shoot very poorly if Im cold.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.160s Queries: 76 (0.125s) Memory: 0.9761 MB (Peak: 1.9024 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-21 17:11:18 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS