|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
3 members (JDH, Argo44, 1 invisible),
1,122
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,503
Posts545,538
Members14,414
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994 Likes: 402
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994 Likes: 402 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 138
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 138 |
So easy to refute what he says. Buy RST shells. Shoot your vintage gun and enjoy. Thats it. Unless Tom Roster has more than conjecture to put out, Ill just ignore him. I think Sherman Bells work was cased closed on the supposed danger of Damascus barrels.
Last edited by LeatherWoodSteel; 01/29/20 09:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105 |
So easy to refute what he says. Buy RST shells. Shoot your vintage gun and enjoy. Thats it. Unless Tom Roster has more than conjecture to put out, Ill just ignore him. I think Sherman Bells work was cased closed on the supposed danger of Damascus barrels. Bell also clarified the potential danger from longer hulls (loaded to appropriate pressures) fired in short-chambered guns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 162 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 162 Likes: 14 |
I once sent Roster an email with a question concerning bio wads. His response was a solicitation of money for the answer to my question. That was rather off putting. Now I wonder about the veracity of his work. I dont see references or footnotes on what appear to be technical topics. His articles seem to simply be a flow of his beliefs.
Last edited by FelixD; 01/30/20 10:48 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826 Likes: 12 |
Ed, I believe all the shotguns we're shooting were proofed either at the manufacture or at a proof house. That would take part of the first part of your argument. The second, if someone can't pay attention to 7000psi being safe, then so be it. That's like someone not adhering to the reloading manuals and their data. Does Lyman, Hodgdon, or Alliant refuse to publish data because someone will read it but reload something different ? Guess I'll just learn to ignore your childish banner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
paul: wood rather be accused of "childish banter", than being partially responsible for someone injuring himself, because i failed to warn him of the potential dangers of shooting modern ammo in old guns...
and the copying of popular doubleguns, complete with fake proof marks was a common practice in asia, africa and the middle east...
Last edited by ed good; 01/30/20 05:16 PM.
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,038 Likes: 48
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,038 Likes: 48 |
Title of the article is 'Pressure vs Recoil'.
There's no relationship so there's no reason for an article with that title.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,379 Likes: 105 |
Title of the article is 'Pressure vs Recoil'.
There's no relationship so there's no reason for an article with that title.
I agree that it's somewhat misleading. I'd probably go with: "Pressure and Recoil: Potential Problems From Each".
|
|
|
|
|
|