March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
4 members (Gankai, Pat Gidley, Gerry Addison, Jtplumb), 791 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,374
Posts544,012
Members14,391
Most Online1,131
Jan 21st, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 114
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 114
Today, the 9 justices decide the fate of the NYC carry law-- sure wish we had Anton Scalia with us--a good friend of the 2nd. Am. and a fellow hunter, shooter, collector. We shall see, indeed we shall. RWTF


"The field is the touchstone of the man"..
1 member likes this: dirty harry
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456
Likes: 86
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456
Likes: 86
What did the scrotum rule ?

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,693
Likes: 450
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,693
Likes: 450
It will be weeks before we know most likely. They like to “draft” their ruling and drop a bunch of them at the end of the term. Court speak for we will have to circle back to that for you.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 8
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 8
probably in the summer is what I have heard

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
If past history is any indicator, it is very likely that the three Justices who were nominated by Liberal Left Democrats will rule against the right of concealed carry.... even though they all swore under oath to respect the 2nd Amendment during their Senate confirmation hearings.

We are most fortunate that Donald Trump was able to seat three Justices who have a history of supporting the gun rights of law abiding citizens. Had Hillary Clinton been elected, it is unlikely the N.Y. State Rifle and Pistol Assn. would have even attempted this case.

It really does make a difference who gun owners support and vote for. However, even if we win this, I predict that anti-gun Democrats will find some way to do an end run, and violate settled law. It's what they do.

I further predict that if our site Administrator approves this post, the supporters of anti-gun Democrats will be clamoring to have the truth deleted and censored. It's what they do.


A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.

2 members like this: dirty harry, Stanton Hillis
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 7
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 7
The SC only heard oral arguments in the case, based on briefs submitted week/months ago by the appellant and appellee and interested parties (amicus cure) months ago. Opinions are usually issued after the end of the courts current term, in June or July.


Around the steel no tortured worm shall twine.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
mc Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
There was a state court ruling against special taxes, taxing guns and ammo the state court ruled it unconstitutional so the city changed the definition and applied a tax anyway.new York will never give up they elected deblasio twice .

2 members like this: keith, Stanton Hillis
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
the law we are discussing here is the sullivan act of 1911...it is settled law as well...

one could argue that it is the business of ny state, and certainly not the bidness of the federal gubmint...

but then read what wiki has it say about its original purpose...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sullivan_Act

and as it is no longer legal nor fashionable to discriminate against someone just because of who they are or where their ancestors came from, that may be another reason to repeal it...

Last edited by ed good; 11/06/21 08:13 PM.

keep it simple and keep it safe...
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 7
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 7
The case that was heard by the SC is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which and concerns a New York law governing licenses to carry concealed handguns in public for self-defense that requires a resident to obtain a license to carry a concealed pistol or revolver and demonstrate that "proper cause" exists for the permit. I will most certainly be held unconditional as similar laws have been held in other states.


Around the steel no tortured worm shall twine.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
hussey...not necessarily...this is long settled state law going back to 1911... the court has been reluctant in the past to meddle in state affairs, figuring that if state laws are no longer the will of the people, then the states will fix their own laws without federal intervention...

could it be that more voters in ny dont want the law changed than do?


keep it simple and keep it safe...
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.077s Queries: 38 (0.055s) Memory: 0.8492 MB (Peak: 1.8987 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-29 02:12:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS