|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (WJW),
383
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,443
Posts544,800
Members14,405
| |
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183 |
![[Linked Image from thumbs2.imgbox.com]](https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/13/e9/NQFYKcuI_t.jpg) Solely from the foto & the description, devoid of sideclips and Greener Crossbolt, and considering the serial number 6060, it must have been made prior to 1880 and was for a lower pressure Blackpowder cartridge. It is possible that Sauer sourced it elsewhere, so the serial number could lie with another maker? Serbus, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207 |
Since the description mentioned it is nitro proofed it carries proof marks, so it must be post 1893.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183 |
Either a reproof or they are mistaken on the >>Nitro<< and those ATM stamps or >>Nitro<< stamps may just put it circa 1910 or post 1912??? Possibly a proof effort on a pre-1893 DR??
Serbus,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183 |
Even >>Vorrat<< stamps do not appear till 41xxx in the Sauer sequence.
Serbus,
Raimeyr
se
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207 |
It is not clear whether 6060 is the serial number or some type "item" number from the auction house. Maybe someone will buy it and show the proof and other marks.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,775 Likes: 183 |
Yeah Ford, for £600 plus $1200 U.S. of A. import costs, we could well know.
Serbus,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,573 Likes: 80
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,573 Likes: 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,461 Likes: 207 |
Mike,
The 47mm case shortened from 11.15x60R is a good possibility but if it is marked 10,5 the nominal caliber would likely be 10.75x47R. This was a popular case in lengths from 43mm to over 60mm. Beside the MB case other possibilities are the M88/ Lancaster case, 450 and 500 base British cases, or Colath/similar cases; but in my opinion the 360 base case is too small to consider. This is why a chamber cast and bore slug is necessary to ID the caliber.
Mike
Last edited by Der Ami; 12/12/22 10:22 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,573 Likes: 80
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,573 Likes: 80 |
If in doubt a cast is cheap and easy insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 177 Likes: 75
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 177 Likes: 75 |
![[Linked Image from casimirlefaucheux.com]](https://casimirlefaucheux.com/uploads/default/original/1X/0afa066ed0756a773baf4338b9b91c539dff2e43.jpeg) And interestingly they also made ones marked 10.5: ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-VTwzjk9/0/3f6edd2b/L/i-VTwzjk9-L.jpg)
Last edited by AaronN; 12/18/22 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
