April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
5 members (FlyChamps, Argo44, Replacement, Marks_21, rocky mtn bill), 1,219 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,469
Posts545,145
Members14,409
Most Online1,335
Apr 27th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 13 of 24 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 23 24
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
2" Arthur Howell & Co.
per https://forums.pigeonwatch.co.uk/fo...ne-know-anything-about-arthur-howell-co/
Nigel Browns, British Gunmakers:
Arthur Howell was recorded at 28 Weaman St. Birmingham in 1909 and became Arthur Howell & Co. in 1917. He remained at Weaman Street until 1942 but may have removed to Whittall Street shortly thereafter. He is recorded as being there in Gun Trade membership at least until 1957.

Similar to the J.W. Lewis 2" on the previous page

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

SN 7,558 is reported to date to 1937. The SN is 7425, but I can't read the date code

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

Double Gun Journal Vol. 16 Issue 4 Winter 2005 by Stephen Howell

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

1 member likes this: Parabola
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
On further review wink I think Brent's Jeffery's date code is a not fully struck 'O' for 1934-1935

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 250
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 250
I am a late reader of all these posts about 2 inch chamber 12 bore guns and it may be that my input here is irrelevant or of no interest. But it seemed to me as I have just briefly read all 13 pages of this post that there were questions in some readers/posters mind about the proof pressure differences (if any) between the proof of 2 1/2 inch chambered 12 bore guns and 2 inch chambered 12 bore guns via the two proof houses in the UK. I just pulled out my copy of the "RULES OF PROOF 1954" ---"Rules Regulations and Scales made in the month of October 1954" and turned to page 20 (of 45 pages) titled APPENDIX II---"for the proof of barrels and the arms of the first class". This appendix chart shows that for Provisional Proof the loading for both 2- 1/2 inch and 2 inch chambered 12 bore guns use the identical proof loads: 266 grains of Tower Proof (T.P.) powder and 1- 1/4 ounces of no. 6 shot. However the Definitive Proof loads for the 2- 1/2 chambered 12 bore guns and the 2 inch chambered guns are different; the Definitive Proof load for the 2-1/2 inch chambered 12 bore gun is 178 grains of Tower Special Proof (T.S.P.) powder and 1- 11/16 grains of no. 6 shot, while the Definitive Proof load for 2 inch chambered 12 bore gun is 170 grains of T.S.P. and 1-5/8 ounce of no. 6 shot.

This data above does not answer the question if both 2-1/2 inch chambered and 2 inch chambered 12 bore guns are proofed to the same proof pressure but it give reasonable expectations that the UK provisional proof pressures could the same or even more for the 2 inch chambered gun; and in the case of definitive proof the pressures are very similar.

I also noted from this appendix (as referenced above) that 2-3/4 inch, 2-1/2 inch and 2 inch chambered 12 bore guns all were proofed with the same Provisional Proof load as listed above; and I was more than a bit surprised at this.

Kindest Regard;
Stephen Howell

Last edited by bushveld; 05/27/23 10:34 PM.
4 members like this: Drew Hause, KDGJ, Stanton Hillis, BrentD, Prof
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 472
GLS Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 472
Stephen, thanks for shining your analytical light on post 1954 Rules of proof. The input from Dr. Drew ,his connections (Vic), the source materials he found which are depicted are invaluable. Brent's conversation with Tom Armbrust was also noteworthy as to the difference in pressure readings depending on length of hull vs. chamber length of pressure testing barrel and the operation of Boyle's law. Borderbill's sharing of his test sheets are a great starting point for reloaders. The grey area for me remaining (more hand-wringing) are the recommended service pressures for the pre-1954 guns which in the 1930s went from 3/4 to 7/8 oz. service load recommendations. Gil

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,736
Likes: 96
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,736
Likes: 96
The Provisional Proof is just for the basic tube before any work is undertaken in order to show any flaws. This procedure is nor compulsory but advisable to save a lot of work being done to a faulty tube. Initially, when the 2" chamber guns started to make their appearance, the Proof House insisted in subjecting them to the same Definitive Proof as a 2 1/2" chamber gun and that is why some early 2" guns have the 1 1/8th. ounce mark on the barrel flats. Later a compromise was reached between the Gun Trade and the Proof Houses which resulted in a lower proof requirement for 2" guns.

I've been at the Proof House in Birmingham when Provisional Proof was taking place. If you have access to Greener's 'Gun & its Development' you will see the illustration and there is no change in how it is done other than the powder trail is ignited from an old car battery rather than a percussion gun lock and a piece of string running through a small hole in the wall. A series of bangs as the powder packed tubes go off in rapid succession and then the iron louvres are opened to let the smoke out. Once the 'all clear' goes all the barrel tubes are dug out of the sand beds. All very 'low tech' but it works! Lagopus.....

4 members like this: Parabola, GLS, Drew Hause, BrentD, Prof
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715
Likes: 415
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715
Likes: 415
Originally Posted by lagopus
I've been at the Proof House in Birmingham when Provisional Proof was taking place. If you have access to Greener's 'Gun & its Development' you will see the illustration and there is no change in how it is done other than the powder trail is ignited from an old car battery rather than a percussion gun lock and a piece of string running through a small hole in the wall. A series of bangs as the powder packed tubes go off in rapid succession and then the iron louvres are opened to let the smoke out. Once the 'all clear' goes all the barrel tubes are dug out of the sand beds. All very 'low tech' but it works! Lagopus.....

This sounds pretty interesting and not at all what I would have expected. "Powder trail"? Buried in sand beds? Nope, not what I thought at all. Do you have any pictures of this? It sounds as if this provisional testing might be with black powder. I would love to hear more about it.


_________
BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 250
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 250
Lagopus;

Thank you for your insightful description that the old method of Provisional Proof is still in use at the two UK proof house. Please tell me this however, in these days how is the barrel plug secured into the breech end of the barrels during Provisional Proof?

Also do any of the London best gunmakers submit their barrels for Provisional Proof now?

Kindest Regards;
Stephen Howell

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 3
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 3
Good work with primary sources, Bushveld.

Lagapus, I am under the impression, perhaps mistakingly, that provisional proof is rarely used with modern shotgun barrels. I suspect it varies from maker to maker.

Certainly when the modern era Greener (Tandy & Dryhurst) were busy making “new” Damascus- barreled guns (with ‘virgin’ vintage tubes) they submitted to provisional proof.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 314
Thank you Stephen
In summary

1925 12g proof and service loads as published by Burrard
No 2" listed (and as noted proved to the same as 2 1/2")
2 1/2" and 2 5/8" Definitive Proof 178 grains / 6 1/2 Drams T.S.P. with 1 11/16 oz. Service 3 Drams with 1 1/8 oz.

Burrard "The Modern Shotgun" Vol. III, 2nd Edition
p. 217
"The 2-inch 12-bore...was originally introduced as an alternative to the 20-bore and fired the standard 2 1/2-inch 20-bore shot charge of 3/4 ounce. Experience proved that this shot charge was too light. So the shot charge was increased to the standard 2 1/2-inch 16-bore weight of 7/8 ounce."

c. 1935 the Proof House determined that 2" chambers would be proved the same as 2 1/2" (See back on p. 5 courtesy of Vic)

2" post-1954 Definitive Proof 170 grains T.S.P. and 1-5/8 oz.

Burrard published in 1955
12g 2 1/2” 1 1/16 oz. 3 Dr. Eq. Standard Service 7,952 psi; Max. Service 10,640 psi
12g 2” 7/8 oz. 2.36 Dr. Eq. Standard Service 6,440 psi; Max. Service 8,960 psi

We'll soon know, but it is likely, post-1954 2" were proved 2 3/4 TONS - Highest Mean Service Pressure 8,120 psi (by Burrard's conversion) = 560 BAR

John Brindle, author of Shotgun Shooting: Techniques & Technology published a review of Proof and Service pressures in Part 5 of his series in The Double Gun Journal, “Black Powder & Smokeless, Damascus & Steel”; Volume 5, Issue 3, 1994, “Some Modern Fallacies Part 5”, p. 11. His estimated post-1954 but pre-CIP standard pressures by LUP converted to piezo transducer PS
12g 2 1/2” Standard Service - 6,800 psi; Max. Service - 8,800 psi; Proof - 12,250 psi

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,104
Likes: 592
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,104
Likes: 592

Page 13 of 24 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 23 24

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.073s Queries: 39 (0.051s) Memory: 0.8840 MB (Peak: 1.8987 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-27 14:42:54 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS