December
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
2 members (Fudd, 1 invisible), 376 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics37,982
Posts538,041
Members14,338
Most Online695
Nov 17th, 2023
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
What thickness might you have on the tube?

Serbus,


Raimey
rse

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
They just worked off the original stamps

How about rifling?? What might the inside of the 0.410" tube resemble?

Serbus,

Raimey
rse

Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Alces Offline OP
Boxlock
OP Offline
Boxlock

Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Both barrels are smooth and bright with no visible traces of rifling. I have not had the thickness measured myself, but I did while googling around find a listing for this exact gun (same serial number) sold at auction in 2016. (And for a heck of a lot more than I paid for it). That listing says the bottom wall thickness is .04. In any case, I will have a local gunsmith take a look before I fire it.

https://auctions.morphyauctions.com/lot-428104.aspx

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 159
Too, a typical 0.410" slug is 7 grammes so in order to get to 16 grammes one would have to double it +2 grammes & that is out of the ballpark. So some alternation had to occur. The answer may lie with the 1926 ledger @ the Suhl Proof Facility, that is if one could access it.

Serbus,

Raimey
rse

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 163
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 163
The Morphy description stated the bore diameter of the lower barrel is .398", at the muzzle(choke). This is too small (in my opinion) for the original caliber to have been one of the Lancasters. This brings us back to the 9.3X74R, as Raimey opined in the beginning. Even if the barrel wasn't very good, it seems like a poor conversion, in spite of my opinion that the previous owner could do whatever he wanted with it.
Mike

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2022 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.039s Queries: 24 (0.018s) Memory: 0.8111 MB (Peak: 1.8991 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2023-12-09 05:13:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS