S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,496
Posts545,390
Members14,410
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,155
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,155 |
The square stern Ducker DO was only made in 1958. Serial numbers were from 100 to 305, a total production of 205.
The DO has several disadvantages compared to the double-ended Ducker: (1) hull drag from the square stern makes it significantly harder to row or pole (square stern canoes have the same problem); (2) square sterns don't turn as easily, or back up in rice or reed beds; (3) they're harder to blind up, and (4) lacking the structural strength of the normal Ducker, the DO's stern is more susceptible to damage. A simple motor mount can easily be fabricated for the pointed stern of the normal Ducker, which obviates the DO's only advantage.
The DO was dropped after just one year; duck hunters just didn't find it worthwhile. AlumaCraft later experimented with an Economy Ducker that lacked the usual refinements of decking, cockpit, stabilizer tubes, blind pole loops, etc., but it never really sold and only 452 were built.
I suspect your chances of finding a DO today are slim to none - original Duckers are hard enough to find, and there were more than 13 of them built for every DO square stern.
Incidentally, the original Ducker came with heliarc-welded aluminum oars, which are now even more rare than the boats themselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,090 Likes: 36
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,090 Likes: 36 |
Unsinkable, with an airtank on each end. It's been proven many times (I proved it myself once) that no boat is unsinkable.
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,116
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,116 |
Jack, thanks for all the info. Any chance that the Wildfowl article you wrote is accessable on line? Where? Destry, thanks for the banter back and forth with Jack to have him reveal the details of the Ducker. Can anyone post a photo of the square back Ducker? Randy
RMC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478 Likes: 16 |
Nice sneakbox, Don. The sail makes it truly authentic.
C Man Life is short Quit your job. Turn off the TV. Go outside and play.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,232
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,232 |
I knew they were scarce, but there's gotta be one along that road somewhere. If you'd ever driven it you'd know what I mean.
I've had five chances to buy regular duckers in the past ten years. Ranging in price from $800 for a rough one, to $1600 for a pretty nice one. I probably should have just pulled the trigger.
But I need another duck boat like I need an additional hole in the head. So telling myself I wanted a square stern kept me from adding another big chunk of something I'll use only three months out of the year to the garage.
Great info Jack, was fun running into you on here. Since I know the issue number I might have to give Wildfowl a call and see if that's an available back issue. Or at least try, they're a different magazine since they changed hands.
Destry
Out there at the crossroads molding the devil's bullets. - Tom Waits
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,484
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,484 |
Check out the Poke Boat. Super light, extremely stable, and travels in an inch of water.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Front view.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Other pic did not show. Side view.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
And one being used.
|
|
|
|
|