Imagine my error. I am constantly amazed by posters on these sites who can accuse and imply but seldom if ever identify the target of their disdain. Someone who has not paid close attention to these threads could reach the conclusion that a member or officer of any one of three or more collectors organizations, or maybe not even a member, is guilty of flim flamming a blue hair who either wandered in with her late husband's gun or maybe was a skilled vendor of high grade guns who was seated behind a table she rented to sell her wares. What exactly are the facts of this case, Brian? I'm sure Dave is about ready to put a stop to this insane rhetoric. Before he does, someone come clean and mention some names.
