While we're quoting the "Rag", maybe someone will post today's Washington Post editorial about the action, highlighting the very incorrect and biased comments about how unacceptable it is to give second amendment rights to individuals. Further, the editorial describes as "myth" the point made by NRA that, since the 1976 ban, only criminals have had guns in the city and now law-abiding citizens will be able to arm themselves for protection. I don't quite understand how that point is to be described as "myth". Even our local criminal element will agree that the NRA's point is far from "myth". The tone and emotion of this editorial make me think that the normally liberal but calm speaking editorial staff is off for the weekend.