Dave set up an additional information thread to help preserve Second Amendment rights with a reminder that posts that didnt move toward that target would be removed.

The first post, from a Washington member with an interest in preserving gun rights, provided an American information source, a Harvard study, that served him as a guide for gun rights.

My contributions citing constitutional debate among Republican and Democrat jurists have not been inaccurate in content although members disagree with their opinions.

Dave didnt provide the thread to promote divisiveness, one side of a contentious issue or as a sounding board for partisan political interests. Preserving the Second is the objective.

This is done by sharing information: whats going on in the courts pro and con, cautionary notes where antis are strengthening and giving credit and support where reason prevails.

Dave didnt make this thread to be a kangaroo court.