Originally Posted By: Grouse Guy
In his first interview since a minority voted for him, Trump is already walking back basic campaign promises (Obamacare repeal, the Wall, etc.).
Here in Montana the state is prohibited by the R-controlled legislature from acquiring additional lands, under the pretext that it is a state budget buster (during things like a big fire year) and that the private sector manages land better. So if a federal R plank is to dispose of federal lands, yet a state R position is that additional public lands are unaffordable and that states are ill-equipped to assume management, the private sector is the only remaining recipient. Given his tendencies, Trump would be convinced to abandon yet another campaign promise in a New York minute.

You're right, I am stumped. All I asked was, what would hill have done for you, the country, double guns and upland hunting.

It looks like supposition is fact. Can you connect hills antigun campaign promises with better hunting? Any how, few of us are one issue kind of folks, why repeat the same thing over?