I still think it's important to distinguish between a prescription medicine and treatment. One is an inanimate object, the other is subjective. It can be argued that the subjectivity of medical treatment is represented by a large anti second national organization. I think if we successfully blame an inanimate object, then it's logical to blame other inanimate objects. Maybe, adequate diagnosis and appropriate treatment should include assessing results and non use of inappropriate therapies. An adverse reaction is like blood in the water for legal types. That's at least one check-n-balance that can be highly motivated.