But Billy, craigd wasn't calling the Mauser 98 a weapon of war. He was asking you a question, because many of your beloved Liberal Left Democrats consider them to be a weapon of war. Certainly, they were once weapons of war, and they can still launch a high velocity projectile that is capable of penetrating police body armor.
That's what I also pointed out to you, plus the FACT that these same anti-gun Liberal Left Democrats wish to ban them for those same reasons. moses recently made a post about a mass shooter in Australia who used... wait for it... a sawed off shotgun. Any weapon can be turned against people... even a hammer or a golf club. Google up mass homicides in Australia, and see how many of them involve arson... burning victims alive. Your willingness to give entire classes of firearms to the anti-gunners shows us the extremely shallow depth of your thought processes. You think that your bolt action rifles and your shotguns will be safe, but the anti-gunners you support keep slipping up, as Beto O'Rourke did, and letting out their long term goals.
And you are stupid enough to ignore those things, and cling to the little sound-bites where they lie and claim to support the 2nd Amendment. Pretty easy to see who the con men are when it comes to gun rights, and you follow them like a drooling hydrocephalic sheep.
