No Coward3inch, you aren't paying attention at all to what I've said. You remind me quite a bit of a little internet worm from Topeka who only sees what she wants to see.
Let me spell this out for you once more. In my view, you are clearly anti-gun because you cannot get beyond blaming only one particular inanimate object for the criminal actions of violent killers. You want law abiding and totally innocent citizens of your country and my country to pay for the sins of a small minority of criminals.
If a violent killer mowed down a large crowd of innocent people with a large truck, you would not blame large trucks. You would not say that large trucks have become the weapon of choice for many terrorists, so they should be banned. You would not say that law abiding truck owners should be threatened with arrest and imprisonment if they did not give up their truck that never hurt a flea when they were behind the wheel.
Now substitute matches and gasoline for trucks, and you would feel the same, and you have as much said so. Have you ever heard about the largest mass murder in U.S. history prior to the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building, or the 9-11 Muslim terror attacks?
On March 25, 1990, Julio Gonzalez deliberately set fire to the illegal Bronx dance club Happy Land in a deliberate jealous rage after an argument with his ex-girlfriend. 87 innocent people were horribly burned to death. The weapon was matches and less than $1.00 of gasoline.
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc...ticle-1.2152091And how about the worst mass school killing in U.S. history? There were zero guns involved:
Andrew Philip Kehoe was an American farmer and treasurer of his township school board, notable as a mass murderer for killing his wife and 43 other people (including 38 children), and injuring 58 people by setting off bombs in the Bath School disaster on May 18, 1927.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/all-about...-in-us-history/There are thousands of other mass killings around the world that do not involve guns of any type. I told you about the arson fire in Japan last July. 33 people, mostly terrified women, died in that massacre.
None of that matters to you. You still believe that handguns and semi-automatic rifles should be banned. You still believe that the owners of these guns are inherently evil and demented, and deserve to be classified as criminals. You claim to abhor personal attacks, yet you personally attack anyone who vehemently disagrees with you, or confronts you with facts.
Finally, the lame arguments you post to support your position totally ignores all of the above. More importantly, most of your argument is exactly the same points made by well known and admitted anti-gunners and anti-gun organizations. If it walks like an anti-gunner, and looks like an anti-gunner, and talks like an anti-gunner... then all the denials in the world aren't going to make you something else Coward3inch.
I've seen very little from you to suggest that you know much at all about double shotguns. And how could I possibly know what the results of a Scottish referendum on reversing your onerous and tyrannical gun laws would be? We certainly know how you would vote, but have not heard from any or all other Scottish gun owners. We certainly cannot take your word for anything, because you have been caught lying and changing your story several times now. Now you have your answer... even as you continue to avoid my questions.
As far as clinging to military weapons shit for brains, why don't you ask rocky mtn bill? He really likes sporterizing weapons of war such as Mauser and Springfield bolt action rifles. Many of the anti-gun Democrats he votes for feel that we should ban those weapons of war. That is just what they call them, and they fear them because they launch bullets at high velocity, and those bullets can easily penetrate police body armor. They are also used at extreme ranges by SNIPERS! As a matter of fact, your Ruger .243 would terrify them for the same reasons. Your .243 is simply a necked down version of the military 7.62 x 51 or .308 cartridge. And full metal jacket .243 bullets are readily available.
How about your Model 12 Winchester pump Coward3inch? Model 12 Pump shotguns were used as deadly military weapons in two World Wars. If you take the plug out of the magazine, and used 2 inch shells, how many people could it kill in very short order? Why are you so insecure and paranoid to need such potent military and sniper guns? Are you trying to compensate for some inherent deficiency or weakness??? Why can't you use a single shot flintlock Brown Bess musket?
If you weren't a fat stupid old demented impotent anti-gun couch potato who is nothing but a one-trick pony, you might be able to reply honestly, and realize the hypocrisy, ignorance, and disingenuous nature of your positions.
And the only thing that the majority here have agreed on is that you have your head up your ass.
P.S.-- We see that you still are avoiding my repeated questions about why you Libtard anti-gunners are hell bent on violating the rights of law abiding citizens, yet most of you are totally against Stop and Frisk laws that actually target the root of the violent gun crime problem. Stop and Frisk is proven to reduce crime, get criminals and illegal guns off the streets, and save lives. And Liberal Democrats simply hate it.
The question isn't whether you personally approve of it. The question is why you and Democrats apparently prefer to infringe upon the gun rights of the law abiding citizens.
Why does this simple question scare the hell out of you Coward3inch?
