Topgun's first post reminded me of me. I knew nothing about doubles guns when I started in 2004. Nothing!!
The DGJ was invaluable as a learning tool. It showed me over time the depth and breadth of what vintage and modern doubles can be. Read every copy cover to cover.
But as I became more conversant on the subject, they became less and less necessary to my learning. Still articles appear that interest me but it's no longer cover to cover as soon as it arrives.
Reminds me of when I got into keel boat sailing and automobiles. I would suggest the same is true for any specialty subject. After 5-10 years, they can't help repeating themselves. Long term readers eventually find most articles a bit repetitive and are looking for that one that covers the subject from a new angle. Necessarily rare.
