Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.
Next.
You don't get to "next" when you have the wrong answer CB.
https://time.com/5572821/donald-trump-russia-contacts/ Really Chris? Exactly where was I wrong.
From your article
....while Mueller may not have found any evidence that Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the election...
After several years of investigation no collusion. But you want the investigations into potential fraud in this past election abandoned after 30 days. LOL
Maybe just stop this line of inquiry while you, Bill and Brent are behind.
Well CB, I read both volumes of the mueller report, did you?. If you take the time to read it you'll see where you are wrong.
For instance how do you explain Paul Manafort providing campaign information to Konstantin Kilimnik?
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/18...nel-says-397597How do you explain the multiple felonies Roger Stone was convicted of including about lying to congress about his contacts with Russia and Wikileaks?
https://apnews.com/article/ad355d2c983e4a7c85bc17e86d8c563fBetter yet, here a is a .pdf of the report. My bet is if you read it all, you might come to regret grasping onto Bill Barr's words.
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5955997-Muellerreport
