Why do these interesting and informative topics always seem to turn into a personal argument? Grow up, some of you.
What did you personally find interesting and informative Dave??? Was it silly assertions about drywall screws, or real practical methods of keeping oxygen laden air from reacting with stock finish, resulting in premature degradation of the product?
Or was it perhaps an off-topic rant about the definition "quarter-sawn" lumber from Queen Stevie, a buffoon who has already demonstrated that he/she doesn't even know the difference between feather-crotch black walnut and thin shell walnut... even when the differences are specifically pointed out?
Or is it neither, and there is instead some motivation for permitting misinformation to stand unchallenged, all because some people are too sensitive to handle a debate, discussion, or argument on the internet?
Perhaps this would better be answered in a new Thread, because Woodreaux seemed pretty concerned that this new Thread might get torpedoed, and deleted faster than a Trump Tweet.
